[2017] KEELC 3854 (KLR)

[2017] KEELC 3854 (KLR)

The court did not make a final determination on the merits of the application for injunction or the preliminary objection. Instead, by consent of the parties, it ordered that the status quo be maintained, meaning no party shall undertake further development on the suit premises pending the hearing and determination...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2017] KEELC 3854 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Chandoh Oakley Moses; Defendant: Benigno Odiwuor
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Migori
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Case 438 of 2017
Procedural Posture
Notice of Motion / Interlocutory Application Ruling
Outcome
Status quo to be maintained; preliminary objection withdrawn; no order as to costs; main suit set for hearing.
Judges
GMA Ongondo
Legal Topics
Injunctions, Status Quo Orders, Ownership Disputes
Source Language
en
Land and Property Injunctions Status Quo Orders Ownership Disputes

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Chandoh Oakley Moses

Plaintiff

Benigno Odiwuor

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Notice of Motion / Interlocutory Application Ruling

  1. 1 Whether the plaintiff is entitled to a temporary injunction restraining the defendant from interfering with land parcel SUNA WEST/WASWETA II/3012 pending determination of the suit.
  2. 2 Whether the preliminary objection raised by the defendant is meritorious and should be upheld.

Ratio Decidendi

The court did not make a final determination on the merits of the application for injunction or the preliminary objection. Instead, by consent of the parties, it ordered that the status quo be maintained, meaning no party shall undertake further development on the suit premises pending the hearing and determination of the main suit. The preliminary objection was marked as withdrawn with no order as to costs. The court thus preserved the subject matter and deferred substantive issues to the full hearing.

Court Disposition

Status quo to be maintained; preliminary objection withdrawn; no order as to costs; main suit set for hearing.

Orders

  • Status quo to prevail: no party shall undertake further development on the suit premises pending hearing and determination of the suit.
  • Preliminary objection dated 29/9/2017 marked as withdrawn with no order as to costs.