[2019] KEHC 8597 (KLR)
The court found that the plaintiffs had provided a sufficient explanation for the delay in prosecuting the suit, namely the 2nd plaintiff's serious illness, supported by a medical report. The court also noted that the plaintiffs had made reasonable attempts to move the matter forward and that the file had at one...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2019] KEHC 8597 (KLR)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Chapex Limited; Plaintiff: Gibson O. Shiraku; Defendant: Standard Chartered Bank of Kenya Limited
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Civil Case 1231 of 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Case / Ruling on Notice to Show Cause Regarding Dismissal for Want of Prosecution
- Outcome
- Plaintiffs granted final opportunity to prosecute suit within 120 days; suit to stand dismissed if not prosecuted within that period.
- Judges
- LM Njuguna
- Legal Topics
- Dismissal for Want of Prosecution, Delay in Prosecution, Notice to Show Cause, Medical Excuse for Delay
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Chapex Limited
Plaintiff
Gibson O. Shiraku
Plaintiff
Standard Chartered Bank of Kenya Limited
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Case / Ruling on Notice to Show Cause Regarding Dismissal for Want of Prosecution
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the plaintiffs have provided sufficient reason for the delay in prosecuting the suit.
- 2 Whether the suit should be dismissed for want of prosecution.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the plaintiffs had provided a sufficient explanation for the delay in prosecuting the suit, namely the 2nd plaintiff's serious illness, supported by a medical report. The court also noted that the plaintiffs had made reasonable attempts to move the matter forward and that the file had at one point been missing. Although the letter informing the court of the illness was not officially stamped, the court accepted the medical evidence as adequate justification. Given the age of the matter and the need for expeditious resolution, the court exercised its discretion to grant the plaintiffs a final opportunity to prosecute the suit within 120 days, failing which the suit...
Court Disposition
Plaintiffs granted final opportunity to prosecute suit within 120 days; suit to stand dismissed if not prosecuted within that period.
Orders
- Plaintiffs to prosecute the suit within 120 days from the date of the ruling.
- If the suit is not prosecuted within 120 days, it shall stand dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
20 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI
CIVIL CASE NO. 1231 OF 2004
CHAPEX LIMITED................................................................1ST PLAINTIFF
GIBSON O. SHIRAKU...........................................................2ND PLAINTIFF
-VERSUS-
STANDARD CHARTERED BANK OF KENYA LIMITED...DEFENDANT
RULING
1. The notice to show cause was issued on 22nd January, 2019. In response thereto, the plaintiffs filed a replying affidavit sworn by Livingstone Maina Ombete indicating that whereas the suit was last in court on 29th September, 2014, the 2nd plaintiff herein; who is the managing partner of the 1st plaintiff; suffered a major stroke and was admitted in hospital. That as a result of the said illness, he lost his speech briefly but has since partly regained the same.
2. I have considered the averments raised in the reply together with the annextures thereto. I have equally perused the court record. Having done so, it is upon me to determine whether the reasons given for the dormancy are sufficient.
3. To begin with and contrary to the assertions in the reply, the matter was last in court on 24th November, 2014. The court record reveals that on the said date, the defendant’s counsel sought an adjournment for the reason that the intended witness had left employment and thus the difficulty in complying with pre-trial directions. Despite opposition by the plaintiffs’ advocate, the court granted the prayer for an adjournment and ordered the parties to take a hearing date at the registry.
4. In his reply, the deponent asserted that the 2nd plaintiff fell ill prior to the 24th November, 2014. This was not brought to the attention of the court when the matter was last before it, though I have seen a letter dated 26th June, 2015 addressed to the High Court Registrar to that effect but which letter does not bear the court stamp. It therefore remains unclear whether the court was officially made aware of the circumstances raised in the reply.
5. Suffice it to say, a copy of the medical report dated 27th February, 2015 has been annexed to the affidavit. To my mind, this forms sufficient reason all the same. In any event, the record shows that the plaintiffs had all along made reasonable attempts to prosecute their suit and at one point, the file was indicated as having been missing. However, I am alive to the fact that this is quite an old matter which needs to be heard and determined expeditiously.
6. In view of the foregoing, I will grant the plaintiffs an opportunity to prosecute their suit and order that the same be done within 120 days from today, failure to which the suit shall stand dismissed.
Dated, signed and delivered at NAIROBI this 1st day of March, 2019
L. NJUGUNA
JUDGE
In the presence of:
.........................for the Plaintiffs
........................for the Defendant