[2022] KEELRC 13296 (KLR)
The court found that since the respondent did not oppose the application for stay of execution, provided it was conditional, and the appeal had already been filed, it was just to grant the stay. The court exercised its discretion to allow the stay of execution on the condition that the decretal sum be deposited in...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2022] KEELRC 13296 (KLR)
- Parties
- Appellant: Swaran Singh Charal; Respondent: Peter Khadera Mageni
- Court
- Employment and Labour Relations Court
- Court Station
- Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Appeal 191 of 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Stay Application / Ruling on Application for Stay of Execution Pending Appeal
- Outcome
- Stay of execution of judgment and decree allowed on condition of deposit of decretal sum.
- Judges
- J Rika
- Legal Topics
- Stay of Execution, Appeal Procedure, Decretal Sum, Security for Judgment
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Swaran Singh Charal
Appellant
Peter Khadera Mageni
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Stay Application / Ruling on Application for Stay of Execution Pending Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a stay of execution of judgment/decree pending appeal should be granted.
- 2 What conditions, if any, should be imposed for the grant of stay of execution.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that since the respondent did not oppose the application for stay of execution, provided it was conditional, and the appeal had already been filed, it was just to grant the stay. The court exercised its discretion to allow the stay of execution on the condition that the decretal sum be deposited in an interest-earning joint bank account in the names of the parties' advocates within 30 days, failing which execution would proceed. This approach balances the appellant's right to appeal and the respondent's right to secure the judgment sum.
Court Disposition
Stay of execution of judgment and decree allowed on condition of deposit of decretal sum.
Orders
- Stay of execution of judgment and decree is allowed on the condition that the decretal sum shall be deposited in an interest-earning joint bank account in the names of the two advocates.
- The deposit to be made within 30 days of the ruling date.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
19 paragraphs
Charal v Mageni (Appeal 191 of 2022) [2022] KEELRC 13296 (KLR) (23 November 2022) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2022] KEELRC 13296 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi
Appeal 191 of 2022
J Rika, J
November 23, 2022
Between
Swaran Singh Charal
Appellant
and
Peter Khadera Mageni
Respondent
Ruling
1. The appellant seeks an order of stay of execution of judgment / decree pending appeal.
2. The appeal has already been filled.
3. The respondent does not oppose an order of stay of execution, issued conditionally.
It Is Ordered: -a.Stay of execution of judgment and decree is allowed on the condition that the decretal sum shall be deposited in an interest-earning joint bank account, in the names of the 2 advocates.b.The deposit to be made within 30 days of today.c.In default execution to proceed.
DATED, SIGNED AND RELEASED TO THE PARTIES ELECTRONICALLY, AT NAIROBI, UNDER THE MINISTRY OF HEALTH AND JUDICIARY COVID-19 GUIDELINES, THIS 23RD DAY OF NOVEMBER 2022. JAMES RIKAJUDGE