[2014] KEELRC 1297 (KLR)

REPUBLIC OF KENYA

IN THE INDUSTRIAL COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI

CAUSE NO 1321 OF 2013

CHARITY NJAGI...........................................................................CLAIMANT

VS

COMWORLD BUSINESS CENTRE...............................................RESPONDENT

AWARD

Introduction

1. By a Memorandum of Claim dated 12th August and filed in Court on 14th August 2013, the Claimant sued the Respondent for wrongful dismissal and failure to pay terminal dues. The Respondent filed a Statement of Defence on 29th October, 2013 but did not appear at the hearing in spite of due service. The Court therefore heard the Claimant ex parte.

The Claimant's Case

2. On 1st November 2012, the Claimant was employed by the Respondent by oral agreement in the position of Office Manager cum Receptionist, at a monthly salary of Kshs. 35,000. 00. On 31st May 2013, the Respondent terminated the Claimant's employment verbally without notice and without any justifiable cause.

3. The Claimant claims that she was not given any opportunity to be heard prior to the termination of her employment. She also claims that during the time of her employment with the Respondent she did not take any leave.

4. The Claimant's claim is as follows:

12 months' salary in lieu of notice......................................Kshs. 420,000. 00

Leave pay for 7 months....................................................Kshs. 17,500. 00

Gratuity

Compensation for wrongful dismissal

Certificate of service

Punitive damages

Costs

Any other relief the Court may deem just to grant

The Respondent's Case

5. In its Statement of Defence, the Respondent states that the Claimant was hired as a Receptionist on temporary basis from 1st November 2012. Her monthly salary was Kshs.15,000. 00. Upon recruitment of a substantive Office Manager, the Claimant's employment was terminated on 31st May 2013.

Findings and Determination

6. The issues for determination in this case are as follows:

Whether the termination of the Claimant's employment was lawful and fair;

Whether the Claimant is entitled to the reliefs sought.

Termination of Employment

7. It is common cause that the Claimant's employment was terminated effective 31st May, 2013. According to the Claimant, there was no valid reason for the termination. On its part, the Respondent pleads that having been hired on temporary basis, pending recruitment of a substantive Office Manager, the Claimant's employment was terminated by mutual agreement once the new Office Manager was employed. The Respondent did not however call any evidence to confirm its account of the circumstances leading to the termination of the Claimant's employment.

8. Section 45 (2) of the Employment Act, 2007 requires an employer to provide a valid and fair reason for the termination of an employee's employment. The employer must also prove that the employment was terminated in accordance with fair procedure and Section 41 of the Act establishes the procedure to be adopted in terminating employment on grounds of misconduct, poor performance or physical incapacity. Section 40 provides for termination of employment on account of redundancy.

9. The Claimant testified that the Respondent's Director, one Thomas Kariuki informed her that the business was not doing well and that her employment would therefore be terminated. Kariuki promised the Claimant that she would be recalled in August 2013, a promise that was not kept and the Claimant was later to learn that she had been replaced. The Claimant told the Court that she was not given any termination notice.

10. Apart from an unsupported averment that the termination of the Claimant's employment was by mutual agreement, the Respondent did not provide any reason for the termination and evidently did not follow due process in effecting it. The Court therefore finds the termination unfair for want of substantive justification and procedural fairness.

Reliefs

11. In view of the finding that the termination of the Claimant's employment was unfair both substantively and procedurally, I award her two months' salary in compensation. In making this award I have taken into account the Claimant's length of service with the Respondent.

12. I further award the Claimant one month's salary in lieu of notice as provided under Section 35(1) of the Employment Act, 2007. The Respondent did not produce any leave records to prove that the Claimant had taken her leave and the Claimant is therefore entitled to prorata leave for 7 months. The claims for gratuity and punitive damages were not proved and are dismissed.

13. The monthly salary paid to the Claimant was in contention. In this regard, the Claimant pleads a figure of Kshs.35,000. 00 while the Respondent pleads a figure of Kshs.15,000. In support of her claim, the Claimant produced a bank paying in slip dated 30th November 2012 showing a cheque for Kshs.35,000. 00 drawn in her favour by the Respondent. In her sworn testimony, the Claimant told the Court that her salary was reduced to Kshs.15,000. 00 effective February 2013 .

14. The Respondent did not provide a pay statement as required under Section 20 of the Employment Act, 2007 and the Court therefore found no evidence to contradict the Claimant's evidence. Consequently, the Court adopts the figure of Kshs. 35,000. 00 as the Claimant's salary for purposes of this claim.

15. Ultimately I make an award in favour of the Claimant in the following terms:

2 months' salary in compensation for unfair termination........... Kshs.70,000. 00

1 month's salary in lieu of notice...........................................Kshs.35,000. 00

Prorata leave (1. 75x7 months)....................... ......................Kshs. 7,525. 00

Total.................................................................................Kshs.112,525

16. I direct the Respondent to issue the Claimant with a Certificate of Service in accordance with Section 51 of the Employment Act, 2007. The Respondent shall also pay the costs of this case. The award amount shall attract interest at court rates from the date of the award until payment in full.

Orders accordingly.

DATED AND SIGNED AT NAIROBI THIS 1ST DAY OF OCTOBER 2014

LINNET NDOLO

JUDGE

DELIVERED IN OPEN COURT AT NAIROBI THIS 2ND DAY OF OCTOBER 2014

MAUREEN ONYANGO

JUDGE

Appearance:

Mr. Omwansa for the Claimant

No appearance for the Respondent