[2008] KEHC 3551 (KLR)

[2008] KEHC 3551 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant had demonstrated a proprietary interest in the disputed premises and had established a prima facie case with a probability of success. The court considered the evidence of ownership, including the certification by the Town Clerk and the outcome of the succession proceedings. The...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2008] KEHC 3551 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Charity Wambogo Benson; Defendant: Loise Gicuku Kibaru
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Embu
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Suit 79 of 2007
Procedural Posture
Civil Suit / Ruling on Notice of Motion
Outcome
orders granted in terms of prayer 2; costs in the cause
Legal Topics
Eviction, Permanent Injunction, Joint Ownership, Succession, Proprietary Interest
Source Language
en
Land and Property Eviction Permanent Injunction Joint Ownership Succession Proprietary Interest

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Charity Wambogo Benson

Plaintiff

Loise Gicuku Kibaru

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Suit / Ruling on Notice of Motion

  1. 1 Whether the plaintiff is entitled to an order of eviction against the defendant from plot No. 222 Runyenjes.
  2. 2 Whether a permanent injunction should issue restraining the defendant from interfering with the plaintiff's possession of the premises.
  3. 3 Whether the property is jointly owned by the husbands of both parties and the effect of the succession proceedings on ownership.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant had demonstrated a proprietary interest in the disputed premises and had established a prima facie case with a probability of success. The court considered the evidence of ownership, including the certification by the Town Clerk and the outcome of the succession proceedings. The court was satisfied that the applicant's rights warranted protection through the grant of an injunction as sought in prayer 2 of the Notice of Motion. The court therefore granted the orders in terms of prayer 2, with costs to be in the cause.

Court Disposition

orders granted in terms of prayer 2; costs in the cause

Orders

  • Prayer 2 of the Notice of Motion dated 27/7/2007 is granted.
  • Costs shall be in the cause.