[2018] KEELC 1220 (KLR)

[2018] KEELC 1220 (KLR)

The court found that the parties had reached a clear and mutually agreed settlement regarding the payment of costs, specifying the amounts and payment dates. The court adopted the agreement as an order, holding that it is proper to mark the suit as fully settled on those terms. The judgment previously delivered...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2018] KEELC 1220 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Charles Iguna Nduyo; Plaintiff: Kithetu Mugambi; Plaintiff: Agnes Karia Makanya; Defendant: Gituri Primary School (sued thro’ chairman, secretary & treasurer of school management committee); Applicant: The Board of Management M.C.K. Gituri Primary School (thro’ the chairperson and secretary)
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Chuka
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Case 60 of 2017
Procedural Posture
Land and Property / Ruling on Settlement and Costs
Outcome
Suit marked as fully settled by consent; costs to be paid as agreed.
Judges
FM Njoroge
Legal Topics
Settlement of Land Disputes, Costs Award, Consent Orders
Source Language
en
Land and Property Settlement of Land Disputes Costs Award Consent Orders

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Charles Iguna Nduyo

Plaintiff

Kithetu Mugambi

Plaintiff

Agnes Karia Makanya

Plaintiff

Gituri Primary School (sued thro’ chairman, secretary & treasurer of school management committee)

Defendant

The Board of Management M.C.K. Gituri Primary School (thro’ the chairperson and secretary)

Applicant

Procedural Posture

Land and Property / Ruling on Settlement and Costs

  1. 1 Whether the court should adopt the parties' settlement agreement as an order of the court.
  2. 2 Whether the costs should be paid as agreed by the parties.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the parties had reached a clear and mutually agreed settlement regarding the payment of costs, specifying the amounts and payment dates. The court adopted the agreement as an order, holding that it is proper to mark the suit as fully settled on those terms. The judgment previously delivered remains in force except as to costs, which are now governed by the consent. The court's intervention was limited to formalizing the parties' agreement and ensuring enforceability of the payment schedule for costs.

Court Disposition

Suit marked as fully settled by consent; costs to be paid as agreed.

Orders

  • The agreement on payment of costs (Kshs. 84,000) in two instalments is adopted as an order of the court.
  • The suit is marked as fully settled.