[2020] KECA 548 (KLR)

[2020] KECA 548 (KLR)

The applicant failed to provide any explanation for the delay of over two months between receiving the typed proceedings and judgment and filing the application for extension of time. The court emphasized that the burden lies with the applicant to lay a satisfactory basis for the exercise of the court's discretion...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2020] KECA 548 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Charles K. Keter; Respondent: Kimbilio Daima Sacco Society
Court
Court of Appeal
Court Station
Court of Appeal at Nakuru
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Application 60 of 2018
Procedural Posture
Extension of Time Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time to File Record of Appeal
Outcome
application dismissed
Legal Topics
Extension of Time, Appeals Process, Wrongful Termination, Court Discretion
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Employment and Labour Extension of Time Appeals Process Wrongful Termination Court Discretion

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Charles K. Keter

Applicant

Kimbilio Daima Sacco Society

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Extension of Time Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time to File Record of Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the applicant has provided sufficient explanation for the delay in filing the record of appeal out of time.
  2. 2 Whether the court should exercise its discretion to extend time for filing the record of appeal.

Ratio Decidendi

The applicant failed to provide any explanation for the delay of over two months between receiving the typed proceedings and judgment and filing the application for extension of time. The court emphasized that the burden lies with the applicant to lay a satisfactory basis for the exercise of the court's discretion in his favour. In the absence of any explanation for the delay, the court was not persuaded that this was a proper case to grant the extension sought. The application was therefore dismissed, as the applicant did not meet the threshold for extension of time under the relevant legal principles.

Court Disposition

application dismissed

Orders

  • The application dated 27th April 2018 and filed on 16th May 2018 is dismissed.
  • There shall be no orders as to costs.