[2010] KEHC 2540 (KLR)

[2010] KEHC 2540 (KLR)

The court found that the delay in filing the appeal was caused by the applicant's insurer, whose legal officer admitted to inadvertently failing to give timely instructions. The applicant himself was not to blame for the delay. The court held that the applicant should not be punished for the mistake of his insurer,...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2010] KEHC 2540 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Charles Maina Ndiritu; Respondent: Simon Mwangi Gitau
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nyeri
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Miscellaneous Application 26 of 2010
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Enlargement of Time to Appeal
Outcome
Application allowed. Leave granted to file appeal out of time. Costs awarded to plaintiff/respondent.
Legal Topics
Extension of Time, Appeals Out of Time, Judicial Discretion, Mistake of Insurer
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Extension of Time Appeals Out of Time Judicial Discretion Mistake of Insurer

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Charles Maina Ndiritu

Applicant

Simon Mwangi Gitau

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Enlargement of Time to Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the applicant has shown sufficient cause for the enlargement of time to file an appeal out of time.
  2. 2 Whether the delay in filing the appeal was excusable given the circumstances.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the delay in filing the appeal was caused by the applicant's insurer, whose legal officer admitted to inadvertently failing to give timely instructions. The applicant himself was not to blame for the delay. The court held that the applicant should not be punished for the mistake of his insurer, especially where the insurer's legal officer had owned up to the error. The court exercised its discretion to allow the application for enlargement of time, finding that the applicant had demonstrated good and sufficient cause for the delay. However, to balance the interests of justice, the court awarded the costs of the motion to the plaintiff/respondent.

Court Disposition

Application allowed. Leave granted to file appeal out of time. Costs awarded to plaintiff/respondent.

Orders

  • The applicant is granted leave of 15 days to file an appeal out of time against the judgment of Kigumo Resident Magistrate’s court delivered on 30/12/2009 vide Kigumo R.M.C.C.C No. 29 of 2007.
  • Costs of the motion are awarded to the plaintiff/respondent in any event.