[2016] KEELRC 1213 (KLR)
The court found that the claimant was verbally dismissed without notice or a hearing, contrary to section 41 of the Employment Act, 2007, rendering the termination unfair. The court rejected the claim for salary arrears and accruing salary as the claimant was not reinstated and the evidence did not support ongoing...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2016] KEELRC 1213 (KLR)
- Parties
- Claimant: Charles Mathenge; Respondent: Nyena Sacco
- Court
- Employment and Labour Relations Court
- Court Station
- Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nyeri
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Cause 42 of 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Cause / Judgment
- Outcome
- Claim partly allowed.
- Judges
- B Ongaya
- Legal Topics
- Unfair Termination, Summary Dismissal, Employee Remedies, Leave Entitlements, Overtime Pay
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Charles Mathenge
Claimant
Nyena Sacco
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Cause / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claimant was unfairly terminated from employment without notice or hearing.
- 2 Whether the claimant is entitled to salary arrears, unpaid leave days, and unpaid overtime as prayed for.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the claimant was verbally dismissed without notice or a hearing, contrary to section 41 of the Employment Act, 2007, rendering the termination unfair. The court rejected the claim for salary arrears and accruing salary as the claimant was not reinstated and the evidence did not support ongoing entitlement. For leave and overtime, the court relied on the parties' agreement at the labour office and statutory entitlements, awarding the claimant Kshs. 14,932.70. The court considered the respondent's willingness to pay as per the labour officer's findings and determined that each party should bear its own costs.
Court Disposition
Claim partly allowed.
Orders
- The respondent to pay the claimant Kshs. 14,932.70 by 01.06.2016, failing which interest at court rates shall accrue from the date of judgment until full payment.
- Each party to bear own costs of the suit.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
27 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE EMPLOYMENT AND LABOUR RELATIONS COURT OF KENYA AT NYERI
CAUSE NO. 42 OF 2013
CHARLES MATHENGE............................................... CLAIMANT
VERSUS
NYENA SACCO...........................................................RESPONDENT
(Before Hon. Justice Byram Ongaya on Friday, 13th May, 2016)
JUDGMENT
The claimant filed on 21. 02. 2013 the memorandum of claim through Mathenge Gitonga & Company Advocates. The claimant prayed for judgment against the respondent for:
The salary arrears of Kshs. 80,000. 00 and accruing at the rate of Kshs. 16,000. 00 per month until a formal termination is issued to the claimant, unpaid leave days Kshs. 11, 193. 00 and unpaid overtime Kshs. 34, 112. 00.
Costs of the suit.
Interest in (a) and (b) above.
Any other relief the court may deem just.
The defence to the claim was filed on 23. 05. 2013 through Kebuka Wachira & Company Advocates.
The respondent employed the claimant as a driver at Kshs. 16,000. 00 per month effective 06. 10. 2011. The claimant worked for 8 months and was terminated without a notice and a hearing. The appointment was subject to 6 months probationary service and confirmation in appointment was to be based on satisfactory performance. At time of termination the vehicle the claimant was driving from Mombasa to Nairobi developed a mechanical problem. The claimant was subsequently summoned at the office by the respondent’s chairman who told him not to go back to work because the chairman alleged the claimant had caused the motor vehicle to develop a mechanical problem.
The respondent’s chairman one Peter Theuri Ndirangu testified that after an accident at Makindu the claimant abandoned the vehicle and never reported on duty. Further, the claimant coincidentally met the chairman at the garage long after the accident and the claimant’s absence from work for several days. In a dispute at labour office, the respondent deposited Kshs.12, 400. 00 being pay for leave days. The chairman (RW) lamented that in the short service the claimant had been involved in numerous road accidents and paid for the liability out of the respondent’s revenues, he consumed alcohol while on duty and he over sped while driving the assigned motor vehicle. RW relied on a letter from the Transport Licensing Board to verify his claims.
The 1st issue for determination is whether the claimant was unfairly terminated. If the account by RW is considered, it is not clear why after the alleged absence from duty following the accident at Makindu, the respondent never took steps to initiate disciplinary proceedings in view of that absence without leave. The court finds that the account by the claimant is credible that he was verbally dismissed by RW after the accident. The dismissal was without a hearing and a notice as provided for in section 41 of the Employment Act, 2007.
The 2nd issue for determination is whether the claimant is entitled to remedies as prayed for. The court makes findings as follows:
The claimant has not established the basis for the prayer for salary arrears of Kshs. 80,000. 00 and accruing at the rate of Kshs. 16,000. 00 per month until a formal termination is issued. The evidence is that the claimant was terminated orally and no reinstatement has been prayed for.
The claimant prays for unpaid leave days Kshs. 11, 193. 00 and unpaid overtime Kshs. 34, 112. 00. At the labour office the parties agreed to 14 days prorate leave. The statutory leave being 21 days, the claimant is hereby awarded Kshs. 10, 666. 70 for the leave. As for overtime, the claimant did not establish the hours worked and the parties appear to have agreed on 8 days worked on public holidays making Kshs. 4, 266. 00 per month. The court returns that as per the prayers made the claimant is entitled to Kshs.14, 932. 70.
The court has considered the unfair termination and has considered the respondent’s willingness to pay the claimant as per the findings of the labour officer where the amount due is not substantially different from the amount found due in this judgment. On a balance of things, each party will bear own costs of the suit.
In conclusion, judgment is entered for the parties with orders as follows:
The respondent to pay the claimant a sum of Kshs. 14, 932. 70 by 01. 06. 2016 failing interest at court rates to be payable thereon from the date of this judgment till full payment.
Each party to bear own costs of the suit.
Signed, datedanddeliveredin court atNyerithisFriday, 13th May, 2016.
BYRAM ONGAYA
JUDGE