[2018] KEELC 536 (KLR)
The court found that the respondent was duly served through an advertisement in the Standard Newspaper on 18th October 2018 and did not file any response to the Notice of Motion dated 13th September 2018. As a result, the court allowed the application in terms of prayer two only, with costs in the cause, as the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2018] KEELC 536 (KLR)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Charles Munene Gatimu; Defendant: Ahmed Muhammed
- Court
- Environment and Land Court
- Court Station
- Environment and Land Court at Nairobi
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Environment & Land Case 392 of 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Notice of Motion
- Outcome
- application allowed in terms of prayer two only; costs in the cause
- Judges
- LC Komingoi
- Legal Topics
- Service of Process, Ex Parte Application
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Charles Munene Gatimu
Plaintiff
Ahmed Muhammed
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Notice of Motion
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the respondent was duly served with the application as required by law.
- 2 Whether the applicant is entitled to the orders sought in prayer two of the Notice of Motion.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the respondent was duly served through an advertisement in the Standard Newspaper on 18th October 2018 and did not file any response to the Notice of Motion dated 13th September 2018. As a result, the court allowed the application in terms of prayer two only, with costs in the cause, as the requirements for service and non-response were satisfied.
Court Disposition
application allowed in terms of prayer two only; costs in the cause
Orders
- The application is allowed in terms of prayer two only.
- Costs in the cause.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
19 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE ENVIRONMENT AND LAND COURT
AT NAIROBI
ELC CASE NO. 392 OF 2018
CHARLES MUNENE GATIMU......PLAINTIFF/APPLICANT
=VERSUS=
AHMED MUHAMMED............DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT
RULING
1. I am satisfied that the respondent was duly served through an advertisement in the Standard Newspaper of 18th October 2018. He did not file any response to the Notice of Motion dated 13th September 2018.
2. Thereby I allow the application in terms of prayer two (2) only. Costs in the cause.
It is so ordered.
Dated, signed and delivered in Nairobi on this 13TH day of DECEMBER 2018
...........................
L. KOMINGOI
JUDGE
In the presence of:-
…………………………………………………..……….Advocate for the Plaintiff
……………………………………………………………...Advocate for Defendant
……………………………………………….………………………Court Assistant