[2014] KEHC 8806 (KLR)
The court held that under the Law of Succession Act, only the wife and children of the deceased are entitled to inherit the estate of a person who has died intestate. The objector, being the wife of a surviving son of the deceased, does not fall within the category of persons entitled to apply for or obtain a grant...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2014] KEHC 8806 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Charles Odhiambo Otina; Respondent: Penina Apiyo Obinju
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Homa Bay
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Succession Cause 57 of 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Succession Cause / Ruling on Objection and Cross Petition
- Outcome
- Objection and cross-petition dismissed.
- Judges
- DAS Majanja
- Legal Topics
- Succession, Letters of Administration, Beneficiaries Entitlement, Priority of Grant, Intestate Estate
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Charles Odhiambo Otina
Applicant
Penina Apiyo Obinju
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Ruling on Objection and Cross Petition
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the objector, as the wife of a surviving son of the deceased, is entitled to be considered among persons having priority in obtaining the grant of letters of administration.
- 2 Whether the objector is a beneficiary of the deceased’s estate.
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that under the Law of Succession Act, only the wife and children of the deceased are entitled to inherit the estate of a person who has died intestate. The objector, being the wife of a surviving son of the deceased, does not fall within the category of persons entitled to apply for or obtain a grant of letters of administration, nor is she a beneficiary in her own right. The statutory framework, particularly sections 66 and Part V of the Law of Succession Act, provides a clear hierarchy and definition of beneficiaries, which does not include the spouse of a living beneficiary. Consequently, the objection and cross-petition by the objector were dismissed as she lacked legal...
Court Disposition
Objection and cross-petition dismissed.
Orders
- Objection and cross-petition by Penina Apiyo Obinju are dismissed.
- No order as to costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
27 paragraphs
IN THE HIGH COURT AT HOMA BAY
SUCCESSION CAUSE NO. 57 OF 2013
IN THE MATTER OF THE
ESTATE OF JOSEPH OTINA TAMBO (DECEASED)
BETWEEN
CHARLES ODHIAMBO OTINA ....... PETITIONER
AND
PENINA APIYO OBINJU ………….…. RESPONDENT
RULING
Joseph Otina Tambo died on 12th August 1985. His son Silfano Omune Otina filed a petition dated 23rd July 2013 seeking grant of letters of administration intestate. According to Form P & A 5, the deceased left behind two surviving children; Charles Odhiambo Otina and the applicant. A buyer, one George Odhiambo Odhiambo was listed as a beneficiary. The deceased left behind one property; GEM/KANYAMWA/1408.
Penina Apiyo Obinju lodged an objection dated 23rd September 2013. She claimed that the applicant filed the petition without consulting her and other members of the family and that they will be disinherited if the land is distributed. She claimed that as daughter-in-law of the deceased she is entitled to be considered as a beneficiary. She also filed a petition by way of cross application for inclusion as beneficiary as the first wife of Charles Otina and answer to petition for grant.
The objector testified that she is the 1st wife of Charles Otina and her grievance is that Charles has divided his parcel of land between her and his second wife. That he later sold a substantial part of the portion he occupies with his second wife. She fears that he will demand part of what is left for her and her children.
The issue for consideration is whether the objector is entitled to be considered among the persons having priority in obtaining the grant and whether she is a beneficiary of the deceased’s estate. These issues are dealt with by section 66of theLaw of Succession Act (Chapter 160 of the Laws of Kenya) which provides as follows;
66. When a deceased has died intestate, the court shall, save as otherwise expressly provided, have a final discretion as to the person or persons to whom a grant of letters of administration shall, in the best interests of all concerned, be made, but shall, without prejudice to that discretion, accept as a general guide the following preference –
(a) surviving spouse or spouses, with or without association of other beneficiaries;
(b) other beneficiaries entitled to intestacy, with priority according to their respective beneficial interests as provided by Part V;
(c) the Public Trustee; and
(d) creditors:
Provided that, where there is partial intestacy, letters of administration in respect of the intestate estate shall be granted to any executor or executors who prove the will.
In addition under Part V of the Law of Succession Act (and especially sections 35, 38, 40and41), the wife and children of the deceased are the persons entitled to a share of the estate of the deceased. It is only the wife and children of the deceased who are entitled to inherit the deceased property. Persons who are dependants of the deceased during his lifetime are entitled to apply for provision from the estate under section 26 of the Act. These provisions clearly show that the wife of a beneficiary who is still alive is not one of the persons entitled to apply for or obtain the grant of letters of administration for the deceased’s estate. She is also not a beneficiary in her own right.
In view of the foregoing, the objection and cross-petition are dismissed.
As this is a family matter, I make no order as to costs.
DATED and DELIVERED at HOMA BAY this 9th day of October 2014.
D.S. MAJANJA
JUDGE
Objector in person.
Mr Oguttu-Mboya instructed by Oguttu-Mboya & Company Advocates for the petitioner.