[1998] KECA 249 (KLR)
The court found that while the applicant was unaware of the ruling until November 1996, he failed to provide any explanation for the subsequent nine-month delay before filing the application for extension of time. The absence of a satisfactory explanation for this period meant the applicant did not meet the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [1998] KECA 249 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Charles Ombati Ontiri; Respondent: Ebisiba Bosibori Angwenyi
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Court Station
- Court of Appeal at Kisumu
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Civil Application 228 of 1997
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Application / Application for Extension of Time to File Notice of Appeal
- Outcome
- application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Extension of Time, Appeals Process, Judicial Discretion
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Charles Ombati Ontiri
Applicant
Ebisiba Bosibori Angwenyi
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Application / Application for Extension of Time to File Notice of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant provided a satisfactory explanation for the delay in filing the notice of appeal.
- 2 Whether the court should exercise its discretion to extend time for filing the notice of appeal.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that while the applicant was unaware of the ruling until November 1996, he failed to provide any explanation for the subsequent nine-month delay before filing the application for extension of time. The absence of a satisfactory explanation for this period meant the applicant did not meet the threshold for the court to exercise its discretion in his favour. Consequently, the application for extension of time was dismissed.
Court Disposition
application dismissed
Orders
- The motion for extension of time is dismissed.
- No order as to costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
18 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL
AT KISUMU
(CORAM: OMOLO, J.A. (IN CHAMBERS)
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.NAI 228 OF 1997 (KSM 32/97)
BETWEEN
CHARLES OMBATI ONTIRI...........................................APPLICANT
AND
EBISIBA BOSIBORI ANGWENYI...............................RESPONDENT
(Application for extension of time for filing Notice of Appeal from the Ruling and Order of the High Court of Kenya at Kisii (Mr Justice Mbaluto) dated 19th July, 1996 in H.C.C.C. NO. 117 OF 1992) *****************
Though the application does not appear to be opposed that is not a reason to deprive me of my duty to see if I should exercise my discretion in favour of the applicant. I accept the explanation by the applicant that though the ruling proposed to be appealed against was delivered on the 19th July, 1996, the applicant did not become aware of it until sometime in November, 1996. But from that period the applicant was perfectly aware that a ruling had been made against him. This motion was not filed until the 7th August, 1997. In his supporting affidavit the applicant does not give an explanation as to what happened between November, 1996 when he learned of the ruling and the 7th August, 1997 when he filed this motion. That is a period of some nine months. When I asked Mr. Soire what the applicant was doing during that period his answer is that he had no instructions on the matter. The applicant says in paragraph 10 of his supporting affidavit that he did not file his notice of appeal and record of appeal for reasons beyond his control. There were reasons beyond his control between 19th July, 1996 and November, 1996. But I can see no reasons beyond his control between November, 1996 and 7th August, 1997. To enable me exercise my discretion in his favour, the applicant was under obligation to give me some sort of explanation for that delay of some nine months. No such explanation is forthcoming.
That being so, I refuse to exercise my discretion in favour of the applicant and the consequence of that is that this motion fails and I order that it be and is hereby dismissed with no order as to costs.
Dated and delivered at Kisumu this 24th day of March, 1998.
R.S.C. OMOLO
.........................................
JUDGE OF APPEAL
I certify that this is a true copy of the original.
DEPUTY REGISTRAR