[2017] KEELRC 1522 (KLR)

[2017] KEELRC 1522 (KLR)

The court found that the Claimant failed to take any steps to prosecute the Cause for a period of two years and did not provide evidence of service of Summons on the Respondent. Additionally, neither party appeared in court on the scheduled hearing date. In light of these factors, the court exercised its discretion...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2017] KEELRC 1522 (KLR)
Parties
Claimant: Charles Ongai; Respondent: Masari Camps and Villas Ltd
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Cause 69 of 2014
Procedural Posture
Employment Cause / Ruling on Dismissal for Want of Prosecution
Outcome
Cause dismissed for want of prosecution.
Judges
MSA Makhandia
Legal Topics
Dismissal for Want of Prosecution, Service of Summons, Non Appearance, Case Management
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Dismissal for Want of Prosecution Service of Summons Non Appearance Case Management

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Charles Ongai

Claimant

Masari Camps and Villas Ltd

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Cause / Ruling on Dismissal for Want of Prosecution

  1. 1 Whether the Cause should be dismissed for want of prosecution due to inactivity by the Claimant.
  2. 2 Whether there was proper service of Summons on the Respondent.
  3. 3 Whether the absence of both parties at the hearing warrants dismissal of the Cause.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the Claimant failed to take any steps to prosecute the Cause for a period of two years and did not provide evidence of service of Summons on the Respondent. Additionally, neither party appeared in court on the scheduled hearing date. In light of these factors, the court exercised its discretion to dismiss the Cause for want of prosecution, holding that the Claimant bore the responsibility to progress the matter and comply with procedural requirements. The absence of an affidavit of service and the Claimant's failure to attend the hearing were fatal to the continuation of the suit.

Court Disposition

Cause dismissed for want of prosecution.

Orders

  • The Cause is dismissed for want of prosecution.
  • There is no order as to costs.