[2019] KEELRC 2435 (KLR)

[2019] KEELRC 2435 (KLR)

The court found that the claimant had proved, on a balance of probabilities, entitlement to arrear salary for 1st to 21st April 2016, payment in lieu of 49 days of untaken leave, and unpaid car and gas allowance for March to June 2015. The respondent failed to provide sufficient justification for withholding these...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2019] KEELRC 2435 (KLR)
Parties
Claimant: Charles Owino Awino; Respondent: Mumias Sugar Company Limited
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Kisumu
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Cause 299 of 2016
Procedural Posture
Employment Cause / Judgment
Outcome
Claim partly allowed; monetary claims for arrear salary, leave, and allowances granted; claims for compensation and notice pay dismissed.
Judges
MN Nduma
Legal Topics
Summary Dismissal, Terminal Benefits, Unpaid Salaries, Leave Entitlements
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Summary Dismissal Terminal Benefits Unpaid Salaries Leave Entitlements

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Charles Owino Awino

Claimant

Mumias Sugar Company Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Cause / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the claimant is entitled to arrear salary for the period 1st to 21st April, 2016.
  2. 2 Whether the claimant is entitled to payment in lieu of untaken leave days.
  3. 3 Whether the claimant is entitled to unpaid car and gas allowance for March to June 2015.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the claimant had proved, on a balance of probabilities, entitlement to arrear salary for 1st to 21st April 2016, payment in lieu of 49 days of untaken leave, and unpaid car and gas allowance for March to June 2015. The respondent failed to provide sufficient justification for withholding these sums. However, the court held that the summary dismissal was not unlawful or unfair, and therefore the claimant was not entitled to compensation for wrongful dismissal or payment in lieu of notice. Judgment was entered for the claimant for the proven monetary claims, with interest and costs, but not for compensation or notice pay.

Court Disposition

Claim partly allowed; monetary claims for arrear salary, leave, and allowances granted; claims for compensation and notice pay dismissed.

Orders

  • Respondent to pay claimant Kshs.320,600 as arrear salary for 1st to 21st April, 2016.
  • Respondent to pay claimant Kshs.779,545 in lieu of 49 days untaken leave.