[2017] KEELRC 801 (KLR)

[2017] KEELRC 801 (KLR)

The court found that there was a clear and undisputed omission in the final order of its judgment delivered on 15th January 2016, specifically the relief for underpaid two months’ salary in lieu of notice including house allowance as pleaded and referenced in the judgment. The omission was an error apparent on the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2017] KEELRC 801 (KLR)
Parties
Claimant: Charles Thuo Muguku; Respondent: K-Unity Saving and Credit Co-operative Society Limited
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Cause 1055 of 2011
Procedural Posture
Employment Cause / Ruling on Application for Correction of Judgment
Outcome
application allowed; judgment corrected to include omitted relief
Legal Topics
Salary in Lieu of Notice, House Allowance, Judgment Correction, Underpayment of Wages
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Salary in Lieu of Notice House Allowance Judgment Correction Underpayment of Wages

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Charles Thuo Muguku

Claimant

K-Unity Saving and Credit Co-operative Society Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Cause / Ruling on Application for Correction of Judgment

  1. 1 Whether there was an error apparent on the face of the judgment regarding omission of relief for underpaid salary and house allowance.
  2. 2 Whether the judgment should be reviewed and corrected to include the omitted relief.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that there was a clear and undisputed omission in the final order of its judgment delivered on 15th January 2016, specifically the relief for underpaid two months’ salary in lieu of notice including house allowance as pleaded and referenced in the judgment. The omission was an error apparent on the face of the record. The court exercised its power to review and correct its judgment to include the omitted relief, ensuring the judgment accurately reflected the reliefs granted and the intention of the court. No order as to costs was made.

Court Disposition

application allowed; judgment corrected to include omitted relief

Orders

  • The judgment delivered on 15th January 2016 is reviewed and corrected to include an award of underpaid two months’ salary in lieu of notice including house allowance in the sum of Kshs.70,000 in the final order.
  • No order as to costs.