[2024] KEHC 2558 (KLR)
The court found that as at the time the application for dismissal was filed, the matter had already been scheduled for mention before the Judge for directions regarding the admission of the appeal. The appellant had not been inactive, and the delay was attributable to the administrative process of obtaining the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2024] KEHC 2558 (KLR)
- Parties
- Appellant: Dindi Ojwang Charles; Respondent: Sylvester Ouma Okuku
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Busia
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Civil Appeal E007 of 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Ruling on Application for Dismissal for Want of Prosecution
- Outcome
- Application for dismissal for want of prosecution dismissed; appeal admitted for hearing.
- Judges
- WM Musyoka
- Legal Topics
- Dismissal for Want of Prosecution, Appeal Admission, Abuse of Court Process
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Dindi Ojwang Charles
Appellant
Sylvester Ouma Okuku
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Ruling on Application for Dismissal for Want of Prosecution
Legal Issues
- 1 Should the appeal be dismissed for want of prosecution given the procedural history and pending mention date?
- 2 Was the respondent's application for dismissal an abuse of court process?
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that as at the time the application for dismissal was filed, the matter had already been scheduled for mention before the Judge for directions regarding the admission of the appeal. The appellant had not been inactive, and the delay was attributable to the administrative process of obtaining the trial court record. The respondent's application for dismissal was therefore premature and constituted an abuse of court process. The court dismissed the application and admitted the appeal, directing that it proceed by way of written submissions.
Court Disposition
Application for dismissal for want of prosecution dismissed; appeal admitted for hearing.
Orders
- The application dated 20th November 2023 is dismissed with costs to the appellant.
- The appeal is admitted.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
21 paragraphs
Charles v Okuku (Civil Appeal E007 of 2020) [2024] KEHC 2558 (KLR) (15 March 2024) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2024] KEHC 2558 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the High Court at Busia
Civil Appeal E007 of 2020
WM Musyoka, J
March 15, 2024
Between
Dindi Ojwang Charles
Appellant
and
Sylvester Ouma Okuku
Respondent
(An appeal arising from the judgement of Hon. TA Madowo, Resident Magistrate, RM, delivered on 6th October 2020, in Busia CMCCC No. 71 of 2018)
Ruling
1. The memorandum of appeal that originated this appeal cause, dated 23rd October 2020, was lodged herein on even date. The respondent then filed a memorandum of appearance and grounds of opposition, dated 16th November 2020, on 17th November 2020. That was needless, as the procedural law does not provide for the filing of any such documents. Anyhow, a record of appeal, dated 8th June 2021, was filed herein on 9th June 2021.
2. After the filing on 9th June 2021, the appellant went to sleep, until 2023, when he was prompted by the court. I see that Ms. Sibika, for the appellant, appeared before the Deputy Registrar on 22nd August 2023, when she indicated to the court that the appellant had filed a record of appeal. The Deputy Registrar then minuted the matter for mention on 17th October 2023, for the purpose of obtaining the original trial court records. A mention for that purpose happened on 14th November 2023, when it was established that the trial court records were yet to be availed, and a date was given for mention before the Judge on 5th February 2024, for admission of the appeal.
3. In the meantime, the respondent lodged an application herein, on 6th December 2023, dated 20th November 2023, seeking dismissal of the appeal for want of prosecution. The appellant responded to it by way of an affidavit, sworn on 22nd January 2024, explaining that the matter was due to be mentioned before the Judge for directions on 5th February 2024.
4. Should the matter be dismissed for want of prosecution? I do not think so. As at the time the application, dated 20th November 2023, was being filed on 6th December 2023, the Deputy Registrar had allocated this matter a date for mention before the Judge, for 5th February 2024. It cannot then be said that the appellant was not active with the matter. Indeed, on 6th December 2023, when filing his application, the respondent should have realised that the appellant had an appointment before the Judge on 5th February 2024, for admission of the appeal, and should have refrained from filing his application. In the given circumstances, the filing of the said application was in abuse of court process, and I accordingly dismiss the same, with costs to the appellant.
5. To move this matter forward, I hereby admit the appeal herein. I hereby direct that the said appeal be canvassed by way of written submissions, to be filed and exchanged within 21 days. The matter shall be mentioned on 22nd April 2024, for receipt of the written submissions, and for allocation of a date for judgement. In the meantime, the Deputy Registrar shall ensure that the trial court records, in Busia CMCCC No. 71 of 2018, are placed in this file by then. It is so ordered.
DELIVERED, DATED AND SIGNED IN OPEN COURT AT BUSIA ON THIS 15TH DAY OF MARCH 2024WM MUSYOKAJUDGEMr. Arthur Etyang, Court Assistant.AdvocatesMr. Egesa, instructed by Bogonko Otanga & Company, Advocates for the appellant.Mr. Luchivya, instructed by Marisio Luchivya & Company, Advocates for the respondent.