[2000] KEHC 385 (KLR)
The court found that the plaintiff failed to prove fraud on the part of the defendant in the registration of the half share in the land. No evidence was adduced from the lands department or the Land Consent Board to support the allegation of fraudulent transfer. The court held that the land was properly registered...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2000] KEHC 385 (KLR)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Charles Waithaka Chege; Defendant: Joseph Mbugua Karanja
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Civil Case 1114 of 1997
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Suit / Judgment
- Outcome
- suit dismissed with costs to the defendant
- Legal Topics
- Land Ownership, Fraudulent Transfer, Title Registration
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Charles Waithaka Chege
Plaintiff
Joseph Mbugua Karanja
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Suit / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the defendant was fraudulently registered as co-owner of land parcel Nachu/Ndacha/636.
- 2 Whether the plaintiff is entitled to rectification of the land register.
- 3 Whether the plaintiff is entitled to exemplary damages.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the plaintiff failed to prove fraud on the part of the defendant in the registration of the half share in the land. No evidence was adduced from the lands department or the Land Consent Board to support the allegation of fraudulent transfer. The court held that the land was properly registered in the names of both the plaintiff and the defendant as co-owners in equal shares. Consequently, the plaintiff was not entitled to rectification of the register or to exemplary damages, as no fraud or wrongdoing was established against the defendant.
Court Disposition
suit dismissed with costs to the defendant
Orders
- The suit is dismissed.
- The plaintiff shall pay the costs of the suit to the defendant.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
31 paragraphs
Declamatory suit Plaintiff is rightful owner of land Exemplary damages.
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI
CIVIL CASE NO. 1114 OF 1997
CHARLES WAITHAKA CHEGE .................................. PLAINTIFF
VERSUS
JOSEPH MBUGUA KARAN JA .......................... DEFENDANT
JUDGEMENT
This is a land matter. A brief fact of the case is as follows:- Charles Waithaka Chege is the plaintiff in this case. He was the owner of land parcel reference number Nachu/Ndacha/636 and holds the title to it. He later discovered that Joseph Mbugua Karanja had fraudulently registered his name as joint owners with him.
On discovering this he filed this suit and sued the defendant for fraudulently acquiring half share title to his property.
The defendant in his defence of course denied this. His defence was that he and Charles were partners. That Charles was unable to pay the full sum of money to the land department/or municipality.
He met all the expenses. The property was transferred, half share to him so as to off set the amount owned to him. All this was voluntarily done including the Land Board Consent and transfers.
From the documents in the file, and the one produced by the plaintiff’s agent, the land was in fact transferred to both parties each owing half share.
During the hearing for the plaintiff, his brother gave evidence on his behalf. He held a power of attorney in which he then stated gave him authority to represent his brother. The court accepted him as a witness.His brother, the plaintiff is said to be in London.
In his evidence PW1 stated that he was informed the property was fraudulently acquired by the defendants. He infact did not in any way know the details of how this happened. He managed to produce his document to court to prove this case.
The defendant did not appear to give evidence. His advocate stated that there was no fraud on the part of the defendant. This in fact was never established by him.
Before me I have agreed issues for determination which I would answer as follows:-
The land Reference number Nachu/Ndacha/636 is at the moment in the name of Charles Waithaka Chege. This is from a land certificate (called Title Deed) dated 20. 5.92.
The ownership according to the given card or registration card held at the lands department is that of Karanja Mbugua Joseph and Charles Waithaka Chege. This is from a land certificate (called title deed) dated 20. 5.92. The ownership according to the given card on registration card held at he lands department is the Karanja Mbugua Joseph and Charles Waithaka Chege held each in half share.
The only restrain being that there be no dealing in land until the said main title is then surrendered.
According to this record the land is held in equal 1/2 share by both the plaintiff and defendant.
Issue No.2
The defendant, Joseph Mbugua Karanja was registered as coowner. The question arises whether this was obtained fraudulently?
The one who alleged this is the plaintiff. He must therefore prove that fraud. There has been no evidence before me to indicate that fraud was used to obtain the defendants registration.
No one from the lands department was called nor was there anyone from the land consent Board called took signify fraudulent transfer. Issue No.3 The court is therefore not obliged to rectify the register.
Issues No.4 and 5
The plaintiff is not entitled to exemplary damages from the defendant as non has been proved.
I dismiss this suit with costs to the defendants.
Dated this 5th day of October 2000 at Nairobi.
M.A. ANG’AWA
JUDGE