[1997] KECA 277 (KLR)

[1997] KECA 277 (KLR)

The Court of Appeal held that the application for bail pending appeal was procedurally improper because the applicant had not first sought such bail from the High Court, as required by section 361(b) of the Criminal Procedure Code and rule 41 of the Court of Appeal Rules. Furthermore, even if the application were...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[1997] KECA 277 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Charles Wanjau Karimi; Respondent: Republic
Court
Court of Appeal
Court Station
Court of Appeal at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
? 8 of 1997
Procedural Posture
Criminal Application / Application for Bail Pending Appeal
Outcome
application dismissed
Legal Topics
Bail Pending Appeal, Stealing by Person Employed in Public Service, Fraudulent False Accounting, Criminal Procedure, Conviction and Sentence, Appeals Process
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Bail Pending Appeal Stealing by Person Employed in Public Service Fraudulent False Accounting Criminal Procedure Conviction and Sentence Appeals Process

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Charles Wanjau Karimi

Applicant

Republic

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Application / Application for Bail Pending Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to bail pending appeal to the Court of Appeal.
  2. 2 Whether the application is properly before the Court of Appeal in light of procedural requirements.
  3. 3 Whether the intended appeal has overwhelming chances of success.

Ratio Decidendi

The Court of Appeal held that the application for bail pending appeal was procedurally improper because the applicant had not first sought such bail from the High Court, as required by section 361(b) of the Criminal Procedure Code and rule 41 of the Court of Appeal Rules. Furthermore, even if the application were properly before the court, the intended appeal did not demonstrate overwhelming chances of success. Consequently, the application was found to be without merit and was dismissed.

Court Disposition

application dismissed

Orders

  • The application for bail pending appeal is dismissed.