[2005] KEHC 1891 (KLR)
The court found that the delay in filing the record of appeal was primarily due to the professional misconduct of the appellant's advocate, Mr. Karingithi, who failed to comply with the court's order and did not provide an explanation for the non-compliance. The applicant demonstrated good faith by making payments...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2005] KEHC 1891 (KLR)
- Parties
- Appellant: Charles Wanjohi Muthumbi; Respondent: Grace Nyawira Maheni
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nyeri
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Civil Appeal 48 of 1999
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Ruling on Application to Extend Time for Filing Record of Appeal
- Outcome
- application allowed
- Judges
- GG Okwengu
- Legal Topics
- Extension of Time, Appeal Record Filing, Professional Conduct of Advocates
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Charles Wanjohi Muthumbi
Appellant
Grace Nyawira Maheni
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Ruling on Application to Extend Time for Filing Record of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant should be granted an extension of time to file the record of appeal.
- 2 Whether the failure to file the record of appeal within the stipulated time was excusable.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the delay in filing the record of appeal was primarily due to the professional misconduct of the appellant's advocate, Mr. Karingithi, who failed to comply with the court's order and did not provide an explanation for the non-compliance. The applicant demonstrated good faith by making payments for the preparation of the record of appeal and provided a plausible explanation for the further delay, which was occasioned by the execution process initiated against him. The court held that it would be fair and just to extend the time for filing the record of appeal to allow the applicant an opportunity to be heard on the merits of the appeal. Accordingly, the application for...
Court Disposition
application allowed
Orders
- The applicant shall file and serve the record of appeal within 14 days from the date of this ruling.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
14 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NYERI Civil Appeal 48 of 1999
CHARLES WANJOHI MUTHUMBI …………...……………… APPELLANT VERSUS GRACE NYAWIRA MAHENI ………………………………… DEFENDANT
R U L I N G
On 12th January 2004, the Appellant and Respondent through their respective counsel entered into a consent to have the record of appeal in this appeal filed within 30 days and that the appeal to come for direction on 13th February 2004.
When the matter came up for mention before the Deputy Registrar on 13th February 2004, no record of appeal had been filed whereupon Mr. Wahome who was appearing for the Respondent applied to the court to refer the original file back to the lower court to enable him proceed with the execution process. The record does not show Mr. Karingithi who was appearing for the Appellants objecting to that application.
The appellants now blame Mr. Karingithi for failing to comply with the order. The applicants have annexed receipts of payments made to Mr. Karingithi on 16th February 2004 and 20th February 2004 in respect of record of appeal. Although these payments were made after 13th February 2004, it is apparent that Mr. Karingithi who had conduct of this matter for the Appellants does not appear to have conducted himself professionally.
He was still on record for the Appellants and the least he should have done is to explain to the court why the order of 12/1/04 had not been complied with. I am inclined to accept the explanation of the Applicant that they were let down by Mr. Karingithi. The applicant has clearly explained that the further delay was occasioned by the execution process which was initiated against him and his efforts to have the execution stayed.
It is further evident that the applicants have a plausible appeal which has already been admitted to hearing. In the circumstances it would be fair and just to extend the time for filing the record of appeal to give the Applicant a chance to be heard on his appeal.
I do therefore allow the application dated 7th July 2004 and order that the Applicant shall file and serve the record of appeal within 14 days from the date hereof.
Orders accordingly.
Dated this 20th day of July 2005
H. M. OKWENGU
JUDGE