[2021] KEELRC 1992 (KLR)

[2021] KEELRC 1992 (KLR)

The court found that the Respondent had properly invoked the procedure under Rule 11 of the Advocates (Remuneration) Order to challenge the Taxing Master's decision on its Bill of Costs. In the absence of any reply or opposition from the Petitioners, the court was satisfied that the Respondent's reference should be...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2021] KEELRC 1992 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Charles Waweru Kimani; Applicant: Abednego Mutua; Applicant: Charles Oluoch; Applicant: Peterson Sagwe Ogamba; Applicant: Kithembe Kyale; Applicant: Daniel Mailu; Applicant: Daniel Mwasya; Applicant: Elly Muratenyi Vita; Applicant: Joash Otwoma Bosire; Applicant: Anthony Mwangi Kinyua; Respondent: The Kenya Kazi Services Limited; Respondent: The Kenya Private Universities Workers Union; Respondent: The Kenya National Private Security Workers Union; Respondent: Central Organisation of Trade Unions
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Petition 49 & 123 of 2018
Procedural Posture
Petition / Reference Under Rule 11 of the Advocates Remuneration Order; Ruling on Objection to Taxation of Bill of Costs
Outcome
Reference allowed; Taxing Master's decision set aside; Bill of Costs to be taxed afresh; no order as to costs.
Judges
J Rika
Legal Topics
Taxation of Costs, Bill of Costs, Advocates Remuneration, Reference Procedure
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Taxation of Costs Bill of Costs Advocates Remuneration Reference Procedure

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Charles Waweru Kimani

Applicant

Abednego Mutua

Applicant

Charles Oluoch

Applicant

Peterson Sagwe Ogamba

Applicant

Kithembe Kyale

Applicant

Daniel Mailu

Applicant

Daniel Mwasya

Applicant

Elly Muratenyi Vita

Applicant

Joash Otwoma Bosire

Applicant

Anthony Mwangi Kinyua

Applicant

The Kenya Kazi Services Limited

Respondent

The Kenya Private Universities Workers Union

Respondent

The Kenya National Private Security Workers Union

Respondent

Central Organisation of Trade Unions

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Petition / Reference Under Rule 11 of the Advocates Remuneration Order; Ruling on Objection to Taxation of Bill of Costs

  1. 1 Whether the decision of the Taxing Master on the Respondent's Bill of Costs should be set aside and the Bill taxed afresh.
  2. 2 Whether the absence of a reply from the Petitioners affects the determination of the reference.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the Respondent had properly invoked the procedure under Rule 11 of the Advocates (Remuneration) Order to challenge the Taxing Master's decision on its Bill of Costs. In the absence of any reply or opposition from the Petitioners, the court was satisfied that the Respondent's reference should be allowed. Consequently, the decision of the Taxing Master dated 20th February 2020 was set aside, and the Bill of Costs was ordered to be taxed afresh. The court made no order as to costs, taking into account the lack of opposition and the nature of the application.

Court Disposition

Reference allowed; Taxing Master's decision set aside; Bill of Costs to be taxed afresh; no order as to costs.

Orders

  • The decision of the Taxing Master of 20th February 2020 is set aside.
  • The Bill of Costs shall be taxed afresh.