[2015] KEHC 3171 (KLR)

[2015] KEHC 3171 (KLR)

The court found that the application of 16th March 2012 had already been dealt with and a ruling delivered on 9th December 2014. The ruling of 10th March 2015 was therefore made in error as it related to a matter that had already been determined. The only matter pending before the court was the preliminary objection...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2015] KEHC 3171 (KLR)
Parties
Appellant: Charles Wepukhulu; Respondent: Bungoma Teachers Savings & Credit Society
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Bungoma
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Suit 113 of 2011
Procedural Posture
Civil Suit / Ruling on Application for Review of Court Order
Outcome
application allowed; ruling of 10th March 2015 set aside
Legal Topics
Review of Orders, Error on Face of Record, Setting Aside Orders
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Review of Orders Error on Face of Record Setting Aside Orders

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Charles Wepukhulu

Appellant

Bungoma Teachers Savings & Credit Society

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Suit / Ruling on Application for Review of Court Order

  1. 1 Whether the ruling of 10th March 2015 should be reviewed and set aside due to an apparent error on the face of the record.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the application of 16th March 2012 had already been dealt with and a ruling delivered on 9th December 2014. The ruling of 10th March 2015 was therefore made in error as it related to a matter that had already been determined. The only matter pending before the court was the preliminary objection dated 24th November 2011. Consequently, the court set aside the ruling of 10th March 2015 on the basis of an apparent error on the face of the record.

Court Disposition

application allowed; ruling of 10th March 2015 set aside

Orders

  • The ruling of 10th March 2015 is set aside.
  • Costs in the cause.