[2020] KEHC 2486 (KLR)

[2020] KEHC 2486 (KLR)

The court found that the appellant had acted in breach of the court's order by filing a bank guarantee without first obtaining leave to substitute the form of security. The trial court's refusal to accept the bank guarantee was justified, as compliance with court orders is mandatory and any variation requires...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2020] KEHC 2486 (KLR)
Parties
Appellant: Charles Wesonga Mbingi; Respondent: Bernard Odhiambo Omusi
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Kisumu
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Case 77 of 2019
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Judgment
Outcome
appeal dismissed with costs to the 1st respondent
Judges
TW Cherere
Legal Topics
Stay of Execution, Compliance With Court Orders, Substitution of Security, Appeals Process
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Stay of Execution Compliance With Court Orders Substitution of Security Appeals Process

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Charles Wesonga Mbingi

Appellant

Bernard Odhiambo Omusi

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the appellant was entitled to substitute a court-ordered cash deposit with a bank guarantee without leave of court.
  2. 2 Whether the trial court erred in rejecting the bank guarantee filed in breach of its order.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the appellant had acted in breach of the court's order by filing a bank guarantee without first obtaining leave to substitute the form of security. The trial court's refusal to accept the bank guarantee was justified, as compliance with court orders is mandatory and any variation requires express permission from the court. The appeal was therefore dismissed, upholding the trial court's decision.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed with costs to the 1st respondent

Orders

  • The appeal is disallowed with costs to the 1st respondent.