[1998] KECA 78 (KLR)

[1998] KECA 78 (KLR)

The Court of Appeal held that the sentence of 18 years imprisonment for a 65-year-old appellant convicted of manslaughter was manifestly excessive in the circumstances. The superior court erred in summarily rejecting the appeal against sentence without considering the appellant's age and the proportionality of the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[1998] KECA 78 (KLR)
Parties
Appellant: Charo Karisa Pembe; Respondent: Republic
Court
Court of Appeal
Court Station
Court of Appeal at Mombasa
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Criminal Appeal 22 of 1998
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal From Summary Rejection of Sentence Appeal
Outcome
Appeal allowed; sentence reduced.
Judges
JE Gicheru, AB Shah, E Owuor
Legal Topics
Manslaughter, Sentencing, Appeals Process, Excessive Sentence
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Manslaughter Sentencing Appeals Process Excessive Sentence

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Charo Karisa Pembe

Appellant

Republic

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Appeal From Summary Rejection of Sentence Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the sentence of 18 years imprisonment for manslaughter was manifestly excessive given the appellant's age at the time of sentencing.
  2. 2 Whether the superior court erred in summarily rejecting the appellant's appeal against sentence under section 352(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code.

Ratio Decidendi

The Court of Appeal held that the sentence of 18 years imprisonment for a 65-year-old appellant convicted of manslaughter was manifestly excessive in the circumstances. The superior court erred in summarily rejecting the appeal against sentence without considering the appellant's age and the proportionality of the sentence. The appellate court exercised its jurisdiction to set aside the summary rejection, admitted the appeal to hearing, and reduced the sentence to 4 years imprisonment, effective from the original date of sentence.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed; sentence reduced.

Orders

  • The appeal is allowed.
  • The order of the superior court summarily rejecting the appeal is set aside.