[2023] KEELC 22223 (KLR)

[2023] KEELC 22223 (KLR)

The court found that the application for removal of caution was incompetent because the orders sought in the notice of motion were similar to those sought in the main suit, which had not yet been heard. Granting the orders at this interlocutory stage would amount to making final orders before the suit is determined...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2023] KEELC 22223 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Silas Kiptis Chebon; Defendant: The Land Registrar; Defendant: The Honourable Attorney General
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Nakuru
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Case 003 of 2023
Procedural Posture
Environment and Land Case / Ruling on Interlocutory Application
Outcome
application dismissed
Judges
LA Omollo
Legal Topics
Removal of Caution, Land Registration, Interlocutory Applications, Burden of Proof, Procedure for Caution Removal
Source Language
en
Land and Property Removal of Caution Land Registration Interlocutory Applications Burden of Proof Procedure for Caution Removal

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Silas Kiptis Chebon

Plaintiff

The Land Registrar

Defendant

The Honourable Attorney General

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Environment and Land Case / Ruling on Interlocutory Application

  1. 1 Whether the court should issue an order directing the Land Registrar to remove the caution registered on the Plaintiff's land parcel Nakuru Municipality Block 23/239 at the interlocutory stage.
  2. 2 Whether the application for removal of caution is properly brought before the court by way of notice of motion within the suit.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the application for removal of caution was incompetent because the orders sought in the notice of motion were similar to those sought in the main suit, which had not yet been heard. Granting the orders at this interlocutory stage would amount to making final orders before the suit is determined on its merits. The court emphasized that issues pertaining to removal of a caution are substantive and should be canvassed at the hearing of the suit, where the applicant can provide all necessary evidence. The application was therefore dismissed as premature and procedurally improper.

Court Disposition

application dismissed

Orders

  • The notice of motion application dated July 7, 2023 is dismissed.
  • No order as to costs.