Chebon v Nangemi [2026] KEHC 2529 (KLR)
- Citation
- [2026] KEHC 2529 (KLR)
- Status
- Judgment
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Court
- High Court
- Panel
- WM Musyoka
- Case number
- Civil Appeal E063 of 2024
- Language
- English
More details
- Court
- High Court
- Panel
- WM Musyoka
- Case number
- Civil Appeal E063 of 2024
- Language
- English
On this page
Professional case brief
Research organized from the available case record
01
Holding and result
The claim was filed on 30 January 2024 and judgment was delivered on 7 November 2024, well beyond the 60-day limit under section 34(1) of the Small Claims Court Act. The adjudicator therefore lacked jurisdiction, the judgment is a nullity and cannot be executed, and the claim is transferred to the Busia Magistrate's Court for hearing and final disposal.
Court disposition
Appeal allowed on the ground that the judgment was a nullity; no order as to costs.
Orders
- Judgment of the Small Claims Court delivered 7 November 2024 declared a nullity.
- Claim for Kshs. 914,000.00 transferred from the Small Claims Court to the Busia Magistrate's Court for hearing and final disposal.
- No order as to costs.
02
Material facts
Parties
Bill Brighton Chebon
Appellant (defendant at Trial Court) Counsel: Okeyo Ochiel & Company Advocates (Mr. Okeyo)Habakuk Nyongesa Nangemi
Respondent (claimant at Trial Court) Counsel: Not statedAmounts and remedies
- Claim Amount at Trial Court: KES 914,000
- Judgment Amount at Trial Court: KES 601,200
03
Procedural history
Posture
Civil Appeal From Small Claims Court Judgment / Appeal Judgment Delivered by High Court (busia) on Written Submissions
04
Questions and positions
Legal issues
- 01
Whether the Small Claims Court had jurisdiction to deliver judgment more than 60 days after the claim was filed
- 02
Whether the judgment, delivered without jurisdiction, is null and void
- 03
Whether the matter should be transferred to the Magistrate's Court
Party arguments
- Applicant
- No material evidence supported the finding; no valid contract existed between the parties; the award was not specifically pleaded; the decision rested on matters neither pleaded nor proved.
- Respondent
- No submissions were filed by the respondent.
05
Court’s reasoning
Legal principles
- 01
Section 34(1), Small Claims Court Act, Cap 10A, Laws of Kenya
The Small Claims Court's jurisdiction to hear and determine a claim is limited to 60 days from filing; a determination beyond that period is made without jurisdiction and is a nullity.
06
Ratio, limits and disposition
Ratio decidendi
The claim was filed on 30 January 2024 and judgment was delivered on 7 November 2024, well beyond the 60-day limit under section 34(1) of the Small Claims Court Act. The adjudicator therefore lacked jurisdiction, the judgment is a nullity and cannot be executed, and the claim is transferred to the Busia Magistrate's Court for hearing and final disposal.
Court disposition
Appeal allowed on the ground that the judgment was a nullity; no order as to costs.
- Judgment of the Small Claims Court delivered 7 November 2024 declared a nullity.
- Claim for Kshs. 914,000.00 transferred from the Small Claims Court to the Busia Magistrate's Court for hearing and final disposal.
- No order as to costs.
Source and reliance status
High Court
This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.
Judgment reading view
Judgment text
The complete available source text.
High Court
Judgment
Chebon v Nangemi (Civil Appeal E063 of 2024) [2026] KEHC 2529 (KLR) (27 February 2026) (Judgment) Neutral citation: [2026] KEHC 2529 (KLR) Republic of Kenya In the High Court at Busia Civil Appeal E063 of 2024 WM Musyoka, J February 27, 2026 Between Bill Brighton Chebon Appellant and Habakuk Nyongesa Nangemi Respondent (Appeal from the judgement and decree, of Hon. Kassim Akida, Resident Magistrate, RM, delivered on 7th November, 2024, in Busia SCCCOMM No. E018 of 2024) Judgment 1. The matter, at the trial court, had been initiated by the respondent against the appellant. It was for Kshs. 914,000.00. The claim was resisted, and a trial was conducted. Judgement was eventually entered, on 7 th November 2024, for Kshs. 601,200.00.
2. The appellant was aggrieved, hence the appeal. The grounds are that there was no material evidence to support the finding of the court; the fact that there was no valid contract between the parties was ignored; the award made was not specifically pleaded; and the decision was based on matters that there neither pleaded nor proved.
3. Directions, on the disposal of the appeal, were taken on 27 th October 2025, for disposal by way of written submissions. I see submissions by the appellant, but not the respondent. I have read through those submissions, and noted the arguments made.
4. I will determine this matter, not on the basis of the matters pleaded, or submitted on, but on a technicality of procedure, founded on jurisdiction.
5. The suit, before the trial court, was a small claim, founded on the Small Claims Court Act , Cap 10A, Laws of Kenya. Under section 34(1) of the Small Claims Court Act , the jurisdiction of the adjudicator, to hear and determine the matter, is limited to 60 days. beyond 60 days, there would be no jurisdiction.
6. The claim was filed on 30 th January 2024. 60 days, from that date, lapsed on or about 30 th March 2024. A determination made after 30 th March 2024 was without jurisdiction. In this case the determination came on 7 th November 2024. It was, therefore, made without jurisdiction, and was null. Since the judgement was null, it should not be available for execution.
7. I shall allow this appeal, on the ground that the judgment was a nullity. The declaration of nullity would mean that the matter at the Small Claims Court is still live. The claim for Kshs. 914,000.00 would be within the jurisdiction of the Magistrate’s Court, and I do hereby order that the said claim be transferred out of the Small Claims Court, to the Busia Magistrate’s Court, for hearing and final disposal. As the appellant did not cause the making of the determination outside jurisdiction, I shall not make an order on costs.
8. Orders accordingly. DELIVERED, VIA EMAIL, DATED AND SIGNED IN CHAMBERS, AT BUSIA, ON THIS 27 TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2026.
WM MUSYOKA
JUDGE Mr. Arthur Etyang, Court Assistant, Busia. Advocates Mr. Okeyo, instructed by Okeyo Ochiel & Company, Advocates for the appellant.
Case-aware research
Ask AI about this case
The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.