[2022] KEHC 10548 (KLR)

[2022] KEHC 10548 (KLR)

The court reluctantly granted the plaintiffs' application for adjournment to allow for the hearing and determination of their application to amend the plaint, noting that although the timing of the application was questionable and caused inconvenience to the defendant and the court, this was the first adjournment...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2022] KEHC 10548 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Cheefwest Hotel Limited; Plaintiff: Chrispinus Mutsami Muteshi; Defendant: Lynn Mildred Bett; Interested Party: Kenya Commercial Bank; Interested Party: Equity Bank
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Siaya
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Case 11 of 2021
Procedural Posture
Civil Case / Ruling on Application for Leave to Amend Plaint and Adjournment
Outcome
Adjournment granted; suit referred to court annexed mediation; costs awarded to defendant and defence counsel; application for amendment to be heard by written submissions.
Judges
RE Aburili
Legal Topics
Amendment of Pleadings, Adjournment, Court Annexed Mediation
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Commercial and Corporate Amendment of Pleadings Adjournment Court Annexed Mediation

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Cheefwest Hotel Limited

Plaintiff

Chrispinus Mutsami Muteshi

Plaintiff

Lynn Mildred Bett

Defendant

Kenya Commercial Bank

Interested Party

Equity Bank

Interested Party

Procedural Posture

Civil Case / Ruling on Application for Leave to Amend Plaint and Adjournment

  1. 1 Whether the plaintiffs should be granted leave to amend the plaint on the eve of hearing.
  2. 2 Whether the adjournment sought by the plaintiffs should be granted.
  3. 3 Whether the suit should be referred to court annexed mediation.

Ratio Decidendi

The court reluctantly granted the plaintiffs' application for adjournment to allow for the hearing and determination of their application to amend the plaint, noting that although the timing of the application was questionable and caused inconvenience to the defendant and the court, this was the first adjournment sought for this reason. The court held that costs would adequately compensate the defendant and her counsel for the inconvenience. Furthermore, the court directed that the main suit be referred to mandatory court annexed mediation in accordance with the law, given the protracted nature of the dispute and the repeated applications that had delayed substantive hearing. The court...

Court Disposition

Adjournment granted; suit referred to court annexed mediation; costs awarded to defendant and defence counsel; application for amendment to be heard by written submissions.

Orders

  • Adjournment of the main suit granted to allow hearing of the application dated 20/6/2022.
  • The application for amendment of the plaint to be heard by way of written submissions within specified timelines.