[2023] KEBPRT 1230 (KLR)
The tribunal found that the landlord's valuation report was more reliable because it provided clear details on the sizes and rates of comparable premises, which closely matched the subject premises. The tenant's report lacked details on lettable areas, making it less persuasive. The tribunal exercised its discretion...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2023] KEBPRT 1230 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: John Chege & Partners; Respondent: Peter Gichuki Mugo
- Court
- Business Premises Rent Tribunal
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Tribunal Case E328 of 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Tribunal Reference / Ruling on Rent Assessment and Notice to Alter Tenancy Terms
- Outcome
- Landlord's notice to alter terms of tenancy approved; rent increased to Kshs. 9,000 per month effective 1 May 2023; costs awarded to landlord.
- Judges
- CN Mugambi
- Legal Topics
- Controlled Tenancy, Rent Assessment, Valuation Reports, Open Market Rent, Tribunal Discretion
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
John Chege & Partners
Applicant
Peter Gichuki Mugo
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Tribunal Reference / Ruling on Rent Assessment and Notice to Alter Tenancy Terms
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the landlord is entitled to increase the monthly rent from Kshs. 4,500 to Kshs. 9,000 for the suit premises.
- 2 Which valuation report provides a more reasonable basis for assessing the open market rent for the premises.
- 3 What is the appropriate effective date for the new rent and who should bear the costs of the reference.
Ratio Decidendi
The tribunal found that the landlord's valuation report was more reliable because it provided clear details on the sizes and rates of comparable premises, which closely matched the subject premises. The tenant's report lacked details on lettable areas, making it less persuasive. The tribunal exercised its discretion under Section 9(2) of Cap 301 to determine that the rent should be increased to Kshs. 9,000 per month, as proposed in the landlord's notice, effective 1 May 2023. The tribunal emphasized that the assessment of rent must be reasonable and based on credible comparables, and that the landlord's report met this standard. Costs were awarded to the landlord as the successful party.
Court Disposition
Landlord's notice to alter terms of tenancy approved; rent increased to Kshs. 9,000 per month effective 1 May 2023; costs awarded to landlord.
Orders
- The rent payable for the suit premises is increased to Kshs. 9,000 per month exclusive of service charge.
- The effective date of the new rent is 1 May 2023.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
40 paragraphs
Chege & Partners v Mugo (Tribunal Case E328 of 2021) [2023] KEBPRT 1230 (KLR) (5 May 2023) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2023] KEBPRT 1230 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the Business Premises Rent Tribunal
Tribunal Case E328 of 2021
CN Mugambi, Chair
May 5, 2023
Between
John Chege & Partners
Landlord
and
Peter Gichuki Mugo
Tenant
Ruling
1. The landlord’s notice to terminate or alter terms of tenancy is the one dated 1. 7.2021. In the said notice, the landlord seeks to increase the rent from Kshs. 4,500/= per month to Kshs. 9,000/= per month and free from any deductions. The grounds upon which the increment is sought are that;-a.The present rent of Kshs. 4,500/= is much below what having regards to the terms of the tenancy ought reasonably be expected to be obtained in the open market.b.The other charges claimed are also in keeping with the trends in the open market.
2. The effective date of the tenancy notice is expressed to be 1. 10. 2021.
3. The tenant did not agree with the notice to alter the terms of his tenancy and filed a reference to the tribunal under Section 6(1) of Cap 301.
4. Both parties have filed valuation reports and the landlord has filed submissions n support of the notice. The tenant on his part opted not to file any submissions.
The landlord’s valuation report 5. The landlord’s valuation report is the one prepared by Premier Valuers Ltd dated 5. 1.2022. The report has used the following comparables;-L.R. No. Location Rent Per Square Foot per month (Kshs.) Rent per Square meter per month (Kshs.)
209/138/4 River road 149. 70 1610. 30 p/sqm
209/697/38 River road 161. 29 1736. 11 p/sqm
209/8246 River road 164. 06 1,766 p/sqm
209/138/3 River road 149. 52 1609. 66 p/sqm
209/138/2 River road 157. 59 1699. 72 p/sqm
6. The report has averaged the above rates and arrived at kshs. 156. 492 per square foot per month which translates or Kshs. 1,684. 40 per square meter per month.
7. The report finally assesses the rent payable at Kshs. 63. 41 square ft x 156. 5 =9,923/= rounded to Kshs. 9,920/= per month exclusive of service charge.
The Tenant’s valuation report 8. The tenant’s valuation report is prepared by Agility Valuers Ltd and dated 19. 2.2023. according to the report, the subject premises occupy approximately 64. 56 square feet. The report has used the following comparables:-Premises Location Rate per square foot per month
Simba Center Building River road Kshs. 120. 00/= ground floor Kshs. 100. 00/= first floor
Central Exhibition Building River road Kshs. 120. 00/= ground floor Kshs. 100. 00/= first floor
Haaki Business Center Price road Kshs. 130. 00/= ground floor Kshs. 100. 00/= first floor
Jamii Arcade Duruma road Kshs. 100. 00/= ground floor Kshs. 80. 00/= first floor All the above charged rates are inclusive of service charge)
9. The tenant’s report has adopted Kshs. 100. 00/= per square foot (inclusive) for letting of the subject shop. The total monthly rent recommended is therefore Kshs. 6,456. 00/=.
Analysis and determination 10. The power to determine or vary rent payable in respect of a controlled tenancy is donated by Section 9(2) of Cap 301 wherein it is provided as follows:-“Without prejudice to the generality of this section, a tribunal may upon reference;a.Determine or vary the rent to be payable in respect of the controlled tenancy, having regard to the terms thereof and to the rent at which the premises concerned might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market…..”
11. The Act, Cap 301 while empowering the tribunal to determine the rent payable does not provide a hard and fast rule for the determination of the rent. The exercise of this power is therefore an exercise in discretion and the tribunal is required to be judicious in the exercise of the said powers. The reasonableness of the rent assessed must be in the mind of the court.In Cleaners Limited vs Barclays Bank & Co., the court stated;“it is the reasonableness of the rent that must be in the forefront of the tribunal’s investigation and determination. It must be the concern of this court too. The average rates per square foot or meter of a number of nearby buildings on ground floor premises in which similar trades are exercised are among other things relevant to assessing the rent that would reasonably be expected in the open market.”
12. The tribunal in assessing rent is also required to consider all the reports before it, go into individual comparables and deciding which is a better report rather than merely arriving at a mean figure of the parties valuation reports. (See the case ofTala Investments Ltd vs Green Spol Ltd, Civil Appeal No. 269 of 1993).
13. The subject premises is a shop on the upper floor of the bigger premises. The tenants valuation report averages kshs. 100. 00/= per square foot for the first floor comparables. The landlord’s valuation report gives an average of Kshs. 156. 42 for the first floor comparables used therein. I do note that the tenants valuation report does not provided for the lettable areas of the comparables but merely gives the rates per square foot per month. I am not therefore able to compute the comparables to the suit premises in terms of the sizes. I however note that the landlord’s report is clear on the sizes of the comparables for example comparable Number 1, L.R. No. 209/135/4 River road, measuring 66. 80 square feet which compare favourably with the suit premises which measures 64. 56 square feet according to the tenant’s valuers and 63. 41 square feet according to the landlord’s valuers. I will adopt the landlord’s valuers measurements as they favour the tenant anyway.
14. The landlord’s comparable Number 1 has a rent payable of Kshs. 10,000/= per month at the rate of Kshs. 149. 70/= per square foot per month. I find the landlord’s report to be the better report and I adopt the same for purposes of this assessment. Although the assessment using this comparables comes to Kshs. 9,492. 477/= per month, I will allow/approve the terms of the tenancy notice as prayed in the sum of Kshs. 9,000/= per month.
15. The effective date of the notice to alter terms of tenancy will be 1. 5.2023.
16. The landlord being the successful party will have the costs of the reference.
RULING DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED VIRTUALLY THIS 5TH DAY OF MAY 2023. HON. CYPRIAN MUGAMBICHAIRPERSON5. 5.2023In the absence of the parties