[2023] KEELC 18280 (KLR)

[2023] KEELC 18280 (KLR)

The court found that the suit properties are located in Isebania, which falls within the jurisdiction of the Migori Environment and Land Court, not Nakuru. Accordingly, the Nakuru ELC lacks territorial jurisdiction to hear and determine the matter. The proper course is to transfer the suit to the Migori ELC for...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2023] KEELC 18280 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Teresia Wanjiru Chege; Respondent: Ann Njeri Njuguna
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Nakuru
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Case E11 of 2023
Procedural Posture
Environment and Land Case / Ruling on Jurisdiction and Transfer
Outcome
Suit transferred to Migori Environment and Land Court for hearing and determination.
Judges
A Ombwayo
Legal Topics
Ownership Disputes, Fraudulent Transfer, Title Cancellation, Jurisdiction, Injunctive Relief
Source Language
en
Land and Property Civil Procedure Ownership Disputes Fraudulent Transfer Title Cancellation Jurisdiction Injunctive Relief

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Teresia Wanjiru Chege

Applicant

Ann Njeri Njuguna

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Environment and Land Case / Ruling on Jurisdiction and Transfer

  1. 1 Whether the applicant is the legal owner of the disputed land parcels.
  2. 2 Whether the respondent fraudulently obtained title to the suit properties.
  3. 3 Whether the Environment and Land Court at Nakuru has jurisdiction or the matter should be transferred to Migori ELC.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the suit properties are located in Isebania, which falls within the jurisdiction of the Migori Environment and Land Court, not Nakuru. Accordingly, the Nakuru ELC lacks territorial jurisdiction to hear and determine the matter. The proper course is to transfer the suit to the Migori ELC for hearing and determination. The court did not address the substantive merits of the applicant's claims regarding ownership, fraud, or entitlement to injunctive relief, as these are to be determined by the court with proper jurisdiction.

Court Disposition

Suit transferred to Migori Environment and Land Court for hearing and determination.

Orders

  • The suit is transferred to the Migori Environment and Land Court.
  • No orders as to costs at this stage.