[2025] KEHC 1419 (KLR)
The court found that the applicants were entitled to have the period spent in pre-trial remand deducted from their sentence in accordance with Section 333(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code. The judge exercised discretion to vary the sentence so that it would run from the date the applicants were first remanded,...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2025] KEHC 1419 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Samuel Kipngeno Chelule alias Sammy; Applicant: Kelvin Kiprono Byegon alias Kimalel; Respondent: Director of Public Prosecution
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nakuru
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Miscellaneous Application E178 of 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Miscellaneous Application / Ruling
- Outcome
- application allowed
- Judges
- SM Mohochi
- Legal Topics
- Sentence Review, Pre Trial Remand Credit, Criminal Procedure Code Section 333
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Samuel Kipngeno Chelule alias Sammy
Applicant
Kelvin Kiprono Byegon alias Kimalel
Applicant
Director of Public Prosecution
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Miscellaneous Application / Ruling
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sentence imposed should be reviewed to account for the pre-trial remand period served by the applicants.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicants were entitled to have the period spent in pre-trial remand deducted from their sentence in accordance with Section 333(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code. The judge exercised discretion to vary the sentence so that it would run from the date the applicants were first remanded, being September 14, 2015. This ensures compliance with statutory requirements and upholds the principle that time already served should be credited towards the total sentence imposed.
Court Disposition
application allowed
Orders
- The sentence imposed on the applicants shall run from September 14, 2015.
- The sentence is varied to include the pre-trial remand period served.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
20 paragraphs
Chelule alias Sammy & another v Director of Public Prosecution (Criminal Miscellaneous Application E178 of 2024) [2025] KEHC 1419 (KLR) (18 February 2025) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2025] KEHC 1419 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the High Court at Nakuru
Criminal Miscellaneous Application E178 of 2024
SM Mohochi, J
February 18, 2025
Between
Samuel Kipngeno Chelule alias Sammy
1st Applicant
Kelvin Kiprono Byegon alias Kimalel
2nd Applicant
and
Director of Public Prosecution
Respondent
Ruling
1. This court finds favour with undated Notice of Motion seeking review of the sentence imposed to include the pre-trial remand period served.
2. I hereby invoke the provision of Section 333 of the Criminal Procedure Code to vary the sentence imposed.
3. The sentence imposed shall run from September 14, 2015. It is so ordered.
SIGNED, DATED AND DELIVEREDAT NAKURU ON THIS 18TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025. MOHOCHI S. M.JUDGE