[2000] KECA 196 (KLR)

[2000] KECA 196 (KLR)

The court exercised its unfettered discretion under Rule 4 of the Court of Appeal Rules to grant the applicant an extension of time to file the Notice of Appeal and Record of Appeal. The decision was based on the fact that the previous appeal was struck out due to procedural defects, which have since been rectified....

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2000] KECA 196 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Chemigas Limited; Respondent: BOC Kenya Limited
Court
Court of Appeal
Court Station
Court of Appeal at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
? 136 of ??
Procedural Posture
Civil Application / Application for Extension of Time to File Notice and Record of Appeal
Outcome
Application granted. Extension of time to file Notice of Appeal and Record of Appeal allowed.
Legal Topics
Extension of Time, Appeals Process, Procedural Compliance
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Extension of Time Appeals Process Procedural Compliance

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Chemigas Limited

Applicant

BOC Kenya Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Application / Application for Extension of Time to File Notice and Record of Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the applicant should be granted an extension of time to file and serve the Notice of Appeal and Record of Appeal.
  2. 2 Whether the court's discretion should be exercised in favour of the applicant given the rectification of previous procedural defects.

Ratio Decidendi

The court exercised its unfettered discretion under Rule 4 of the Court of Appeal Rules to grant the applicant an extension of time to file the Notice of Appeal and Record of Appeal. The decision was based on the fact that the previous appeal was struck out due to procedural defects, which have since been rectified. The absence of opposition from the respondent and the rectification of the defects satisfied the court that this was a proper case for the exercise of its discretion in favour of the applicant. The court further ordered that the appeal be heard on a priority basis and awarded costs to the respondent.

Court Disposition

Application granted. Extension of time to file Notice of Appeal and Record of Appeal allowed.

Orders

  • Applicant to file Notice of Appeal within 7 days from the date of the ruling.
  • Applicant to file Record of Appeal within 21 days from the date of the ruling.