[2024] KEELRC 1651 (KLR)

[2024] KEELRC 1651 (KLR)

The court found that the claimant had established her employment relationship with the respondent and had provided documentary evidence, including payslips and correspondence, confirming the sums owed for unpaid locums and surgeries. The respondent failed to respond to the claim or contest the evidence presented....

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2024] KEELRC 1651 (KLR)
Parties
Claimant: Beatrice Chemutai; Respondent: Oasis Healthcare Group Limited
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Cause E505 of 2023
Procedural Posture
Employment Cause / Judgment
Outcome
judgment for the claimant
Judges
Nzioki wa Makau
Legal Topics
Wrongful Termination, Salary Arrears, Unpaid Locum Work, Employment Contracts
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Wrongful Termination Salary Arrears Unpaid Locum Work Employment Contracts

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Beatrice Chemutai

Claimant

Oasis Healthcare Group Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Cause / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the claimant was wrongfully terminated from employment by the respondent.
  2. 2 Whether the claimant is entitled to unpaid salary arrears and payments for locums and surgeries.
  3. 3 Whether the respondent failed to pay the agreed contractual sums to the claimant.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the claimant had established her employment relationship with the respondent and had provided documentary evidence, including payslips and correspondence, confirming the sums owed for unpaid locums and surgeries. The respondent failed to respond to the claim or contest the evidence presented. The court held that the claimant was entitled to judgment for the proven sum of Kshs. 104,000, being the amount specifically claimed and evidenced in her payment reminder. The claim for salary arrears of Kshs. 140,000 was not sufficiently substantiated in the evidence before the court. Accordingly, judgment was entered for the claimant for Kshs. 104,000, together with costs and...

Court Disposition

judgment for the claimant

Orders

  • The respondent shall pay the claimant Kshs. 104,000 as unpaid arrears.
  • The respondent shall pay the costs of the suit.