[2023] KEHC 631 (KLR)
The court found that the mandatory life sentence imposed under section 8(2) of the Sexual Offences Act is unconstitutional as it removes judicial discretion and does not allow for consideration of mitigating factors. The court noted that the applicant did not have an opportunity to present mitigation at trial, and...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2023] KEHC 631 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Ali Hamisi Chengele; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Mombasa
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Miscellaneous Criminal Application E118 of 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Criminal Application / Sentence Review Ruling
- Outcome
- application_allowed
- Judges
- A. Ong’injo
- Legal Topics
- Defilement, Sentencing Review, Mandatory Sentences, Mitigation, Sexual Offences Act, Custodial Sentences
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ali Hamisi Chengele
Applicant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Criminal Application / Sentence Review Ruling
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the mandatory life sentence for defilement under the Sexual Offences Act is constitutional in light of emerging jurisprudence.
- 2 Whether the applicant's mitigating factors warrant a review of his sentence.
- 3 Whether the period spent in custody prior to conviction should be considered in resentencing.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the mandatory life sentence imposed under section 8(2) of the Sexual Offences Act is unconstitutional as it removes judicial discretion and does not allow for consideration of mitigating factors. The court noted that the applicant did not have an opportunity to present mitigation at trial, and that his personal circumstances—including being a first offender, his age, good conduct in prison, and family situation—should be considered. In line with recent jurisprudence favoring determinate sentences, the court set aside the life sentence and substituted it with a term of 25 years imprisonment, effective from the date of first arraignment.
Court Disposition
application_allowed
Orders
- The life imprisonment sentence is set aside.
- The applicant is sentenced to 25 years imprisonment with effect from December 17, 2009.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
20 paragraphs
Chengele v Republic (Miscellaneous Criminal Application E118 of 2022) [2023] KEHC 631 (KLR) (8 February 2023) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2023] KEHC 631 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the High Court at Mombasa
Miscellaneous Criminal Application E118 of 2022
A. Ong’injo, J
February 8, 2023
Between
Ali Hamisi Chengele
Applicant
and
Republic
Respondent
Ruling
1. The applicant was charged with the offence of defilement contrary to section 8 (1) as read with 8 (2) of the Sexual Offences Act No. 3 of 2006 in Mombasa Criminal Case No 4039 of 2009 on December 17, 2009. He was convicted and sentenced to serve life imprisonment on January 17, 2011.
2. The Applicant’s appeal in High Court Criminal Appeal No. 7 of 2011 was dismissed and he now seeks for a review of his sentence in consideration of mitigating factors that he has indicated in his application namely: -i.That during his incarceration, he has lived well with his fellow inmates and prison authorities and a favourable report has been made by the authorities to that effect.ii.That he is a first offender.iii.That he has a wife and six children who are suffering in his absence as the wife is jobless.iv.That he is 57 years old.
3. The applicant also sought that the court takes into account the period that he has been in custody prior to his conviction and makes orders that it deems fit.
4. Although the trial magistrate stated that he had considered the applicant’s mitigation before sentence, in actual sense the applicant did not give any mitigation. He simply said that he had nothing to say and that the allegations are not true.
5. In consideration of the emerging jurisprudence that mandatory sentences take away the discretion of the trial court in sentencing and that they are unconstitutional and in consideration of preference for determinate sentences, this court finds that the application is merited. The life imprisonment is set aside and substituted with 25 years imprisonment with effect from December 17, 2009 when the applicant was first arraigned in court.
DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED IN OPEN COURT/ONLINE THROUGH MS TEAMS, THIS 8TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2023HON. LADY JUSTICE A. ONG’INJOJUDGEIn the presence of: -Ogwel- Court AssistantMr. Ngiri for the RespondentApplicant present in person