[2024] KEHC 10802 (KLR)
The court found that the applicant had established a prima facie case for the issuance of a writ of habeas corpus. Given the urgency and the constitutional right to liberty, the court certified the matter as urgent and ordered the respondents to produce the body of Judith Chepkorir before the Kibera Chief...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2024] KEHC 10802 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Judith Chepkorir; Respondent: Inspector General Of Police; Respondent: Directorate of Criminal Investigations; Respondent: Director Of Public Prosecutions
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Kibera
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Miscellaneous Criminal Application E146 of 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Criminal Application / Ruling on Habeas Corpus Application
- Outcome
- Orders granted for production of applicant and explanation for detention.
- Judges
- DR Kavedza
- Legal Topics
- Habeas Corpus, Unlawful Detention, Production of Detainee
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Judith Chepkorir
Applicant
Inspector General Of Police
Respondent
Directorate of Criminal Investigations
Respondent
Director Of Public Prosecutions
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Criminal Application / Ruling on Habeas Corpus Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant, Judith Chepkorir, is being unlawfully detained by the respondents.
- 2 Whether an order of habeas corpus should issue compelling the respondents to produce the applicant before court.
- 3 Whether the respondents should be required to explain why the applicant should not be released on bail or bond.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicant had established a prima facie case for the issuance of a writ of habeas corpus. Given the urgency and the constitutional right to liberty, the court certified the matter as urgent and ordered the respondents to produce the body of Judith Chepkorir before the Kibera Chief Magistrate’s Court by a specified date. The court further directed the respondents to explain why the applicant should not be released on bail or bond, and allowed the Director of Public Prosecutions to present any charges if warranted. The orders were made to safeguard the applicant's constitutional rights and ensure judicial oversight over her detention.
Court Disposition
Orders granted for production of applicant and explanation for detention.
Orders
- The matter is certified urgent.
- The respondents are directed to produce the body of Judith Chepkorir on or before 23rd September 2024 at Kibera Chief Magistrate’s Court.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
20 paragraphs
Chepkorir v Inspector General of Police & 2 others (Miscellaneous Criminal Application E146 of 2024) [2024] KEHC 10802 (KLR) (18 September 2024) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2024] KEHC 10802 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the High Court at Kibera
Miscellaneous Criminal Application E146 of 2024
DR Kavedza, J
September 18, 2024
Between
Judith Chepkorir
Applicant
and
Inspector General Of Police
1st Respondent
Directorate of Criminal Investigations
2nd Respondent
Director Of Public Prosecutions
3rd Respondent
Ruling
1. I have considered the chamber summons dated 17th September 2024 filed under certificate of urgency, supported by an affidavit sworn by the applicant’s brother Cosmas Kiprono Rotich seeking orders of habeus corpus to have the body of Judith Chepkorir be produced. I hereby make the following orders:I.The matter is certified urgentII.The Respondents are hereby directed to produce the body of Judith Chepkorir on or before 23rd September 2024 at Kibera Chief Magistrate’s Court.III.That further to the orders in (II) above, the respondents should explain why the said Judith Chepkorir should not be released on bail/bond.IV.Upon such production, the 3rd respondent is at liberty to present any charge against the said Judith Chepkorir in any court in which case the orders of this court shall lapse; and such trial court will be at liberty to make a decision on whether to grant bail/bond or not for the ends of justice to be met.V.The applicant is directed to serve the respondents with this ruling before end of business today.
Orders accordingly.RULING DATED AND DELIVERED VIRTUALLY THIS 18TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2024D. KAVEDZAJUDGE