[2024] KEELC 7394 (KLR)

[2024] KEELC 7394 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant and their counsel failed to appear for the hearing of the application dated 8/5/2024 despite being served and aware of the hearing date. The respondent was present and had filed grounds of opposition. In the absence of the applicant, and upon the respondent's request, the court...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2024] KEELC 7394 (KLR)
Parties
Appellant: Margaret Cheptoo (Suing As The Administrator Of The Estate Of Dinah Cheptum Ngetich); Respondent: Alice Andeyo Onoka
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Kapsabet
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment and Land Appeal E007 of 2024
Procedural Posture
Environment and Land Appeal / Ruling on Interlocutory Application
Outcome
Application dismissed for non-appearance and want of prosecution with costs to the respondent.
Judges
MN Mwanyale
Legal Topics
Dismissal for Non Appearance, Want of Prosecution, Costs Award
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Land and Property Dismissal for Non Appearance Want of Prosecution Costs Award

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Margaret Cheptoo (Suing As The Administrator Of The Estate Of Dinah Cheptum Ngetich)

Appellant

Alice Andeyo Onoka

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Environment and Land Appeal / Ruling on Interlocutory Application

  1. 1 Whether the application dated 8/5/2024 should be dismissed for non-appearance and want of prosecution.
  2. 2 Whether the respondent is entitled to costs upon dismissal of the application.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant and their counsel failed to appear for the hearing of the application dated 8/5/2024 despite being served and aware of the hearing date. The respondent was present and had filed grounds of opposition. In the absence of the applicant, and upon the respondent's request, the court exercised its discretion to dismiss the application for non-appearance and want of prosecution. The court further awarded costs to the respondent, in line with the principle that costs follow the event.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed for non-appearance and want of prosecution with costs to the respondent.

Orders

  • The application dated 8/5/2024 is dismissed for non-appearance and want of prosecution.
  • Costs awarded to the respondent.