[2024] KEHC 1347 (KLR)

[2024] KEHC 1347 (KLR)

The court found that the omission to address funeral expenses in its earlier judgment constituted an error apparent on the face of the record. Since the trial court had awarded funeral expenses and this was not disturbed on appeal, the High Court held that the award should be included in the judgment, but subject to...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2024] KEHC 1347 (KLR)
Parties
Appellant: Cherangani Hills Limited; Appellant: John Kimtai Kiboi; Respondent: Miriam Chetech Rashid; Respondent: Patrick Githongothi Ng’ang’a
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Kapenguria
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Appeal E003 of 2022
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Ruling on Application for Review of Judgment
Outcome
application for review allowed in part
Judges
AC Mrima
Legal Topics
Review of Judgment, Funeral Expenses, Apportionment of Liability
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Tort Law Review of Judgment Funeral Expenses Apportionment of Liability

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Cherangani Hills Limited

Appellant

John Kimtai Kiboi

Appellant

Miriam Chetech Rashid

Respondent

Patrick Githongothi Ng’ang’a

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Ruling on Application for Review of Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the court omitted to address the issue of funeral expenses in its judgment.
  2. 2 Whether funeral expenses awarded by the trial court should be subjected to the 50% liability apportionment found on appeal.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the omission to address funeral expenses in its earlier judgment constituted an error apparent on the face of the record. Since the trial court had awarded funeral expenses and this was not disturbed on appeal, the High Court held that the award should be included in the judgment, but subject to the 50% liability apportionment as previously determined. The application for review was therefore merited and allowed to the extent that the judgment was amended to include the funeral expenses, apportioned as per the court's finding on liability. Each party was ordered to bear its own costs of the application.

Court Disposition

application for review allowed in part

Orders

  • Order 2 of the judgment delivered on 31st May, 2023 is amended to include an award of Kshs. 50,000 as funeral expenses, subject to 50% contribution.
  • Each party shall bear its own costs of the application.