[2025] KEELC 3890 (KLR)

[2025] KEELC 3890 (KLR)

The court found that the parties had voluntarily settled the dispute through Court Annexed Mediation, culminating in a Mediation Settlement Agreement that resolved all issues in contention, including the transfer of the suit parcels to the applicants and subdivision of other land. The court recognized that the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2025] KEELC 3890 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Christine Cherubet; Applicant: William Kogo Baryori; Defendant: Romana Chepkoech Kebenei
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Kapsabet
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Enviromental and Land Originating Summons E001 of 2023
Procedural Posture
Originating Summons / Judgment
Outcome
Judgment entered in terms of the Mediation Settlement Agreement dated February 6, 2025.
Judges
GMA Ongondo, J Ongondo
Legal Topics
Adverse Possession, Mediation Settlement, Land Registration, Limitation of Actions
Source Language
en
Land and Property Civil Procedure Adverse Possession Mediation Settlement Land Registration Limitation of Actions

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Christine Cherubet

Applicant

William Kogo Baryori

Applicant

Romana Chepkoech Kebenei

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Originating Summons / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the applicants are entitled to be declared proprietors of Nandi/Kaptich/699 and Nandi/Kaptich/701 by virtue of adverse possession.
  2. 2 Whether the respondent's title to the suit parcels has been extinguished under the doctrine of adverse possession.
  3. 3 Whether judgment should be entered in terms of the Mediation Settlement Agreement.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the parties had voluntarily settled the dispute through Court Annexed Mediation, culminating in a Mediation Settlement Agreement that resolved all issues in contention, including the transfer of the suit parcels to the applicants and subdivision of other land. The court recognized that the settlement was in line with the constitutional imperative to promote alternative dispute resolution mechanisms and the relevant procedural rules. Consequently, the court adopted the Mediation Settlement Agreement as the judgment of the court, thereby disposing of the originating summons in accordance with the agreed terms.

Court Disposition

Judgment entered in terms of the Mediation Settlement Agreement dated February 6, 2025.

Orders

  • Judgment is entered in terms of the Mediation Settlement Agreement dated February 6, 2025 as set out in the judgment.
  • The parties shall implement the terms of the Mediation Settlement Agreement, including transfer and subdivision of the relevant land parcels.