https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/scc/2026/208

https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/scc/2026/208

The claim was not incompetent for want of a verifying affidavit because the Small Claims Court regime does not require one. The undated claim was only a formal irregularity, curable without striking out the matter, especially since no prejudice was shown and the filing date was ascertainable from the record.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2026] SCC 208 (KLR)
Parties
Claimant: Valary Cherunya; Respondent: Max-Global Ltd; Respondent: Cornelius Kiplagat and 1 others
Court
Small Claims Court
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Commercial Case E651 of 2026
Procedural Posture
Small Claims Court Civil Claim / Ruling on Preliminary Objection/application to File Verifying Affidavit
Outcome
Respondent’s objection overruled; application to file a verifying affidavit declined; claimant directed to rectify and serve the statement of claim.
Judges
["ME Aligula"]
Legal Topics
Competency of Statement of Claim, Verifying Affidavit Requirement, Undated Pleading, Procedural Formalities, Small Claims Court Procedure
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Small Claims Competency of Statement of Claim Verifying Affidavit Requirement Undated Pleading Procedural Formalities Small Claims Court Procedure

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Valary Cherunya

Claimant

Max-Global Ltd

Respondent

Cornelius Kiplagat and 1 others

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Small Claims Court Civil Claim / Ruling on Preliminary Objection/application to File Verifying Affidavit

  1. 1 Whether failure to file a verifying affidavit renders a Small Claims Court claim incompetent or defective.
  2. 2 Whether failure to date the statement of claim renders the claim incompetent or a nullity.
  3. 3 Whether the court should allow filing of a verifying affidavit or direct rectification of the undated claim.

Ratio Decidendi

The claim was not incompetent for want of a verifying affidavit because the Small Claims Court regime does not require one. The undated claim was only a formal irregularity, curable without striking out the matter, especially since no prejudice was shown and the filing date was ascertainable from the record.

Court Disposition

Respondent’s objection overruled; application to file a verifying affidavit declined; claimant directed to rectify and serve the statement of claim.

Orders

  • Application to file a verifying affidavit is unnecessary and declined.
  • Claimant shall date the statement of claim.