[2020] KEELC 3342 (KLR)
The court found that the ruling in Eldoret ELC No. 127 of 2018, which the Applicant sought to stay, had already been delivered on 23rd July, 2019, as confirmed by the Respondent's unchallenged affidavit evidence. Consequently, the status quo order previously in place was altered by that ruling. Furthermore, the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2020] KEELC 3342 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Cheseret Arap Korir; Respondent: Equatorial Land Holdings Limited
- Court
- Environment and Land Court
- Court Station
- Environment and Land Court at Eldoret
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Environment and Land Miscellaneous Application 15 of 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Interlocutory Application for Status Quo and Injunction Pending Determination of Arbitral Award Related Motions
- Outcome
- application dismissed with costs to the respondent
- Judges
- SM Kibunja
- Legal Topics
- Status Quo Orders, Injunctions, Arbitral Award Challenges, Stay of Proceedings, Costs Award, Interlocutory Applications
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Cheseret Arap Korir
Applicant
Equatorial Land Holdings Limited
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Interlocutory Application for Status Quo and Injunction Pending Determination of Arbitral Award Related Motions
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Applicant has made a reasonable case for granting the status quo and injunctive order sought pending determination of the arbitral award-related applications.
- 2 Whether the Applicant has made a reasonable case for staying the ruling in Eldoret ELC No. 127 of 2018 pending hearing and determination of the applications for setting aside and adoption of the arbitral award.
- 3 Who should bear the costs of the application.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the ruling in Eldoret ELC No. 127 of 2018, which the Applicant sought to stay, had already been delivered on 23rd July, 2019, as confirmed by the Respondent's unchallenged affidavit evidence. Consequently, the status quo order previously in place was altered by that ruling. Furthermore, the applications that the Applicant wanted determined prior to the adoption or setting aside of the arbitral award had already been resolved by an earlier ruling. As a result, the prayers for maintenance of status quo and stay of ruling had been overtaken by events and were no longer tenable. The Applicant, having failed in both prayers, was ordered to pay the Respondent's costs in...
Court Disposition
application dismissed with costs to the respondent
Orders
- The Applicant's Motion dated 19th July, 2019 is dismissed with costs to the Respondent.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
27 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE ENVIRONMENT AND LAND COURT OF KENYA
AT ELDORET
E & L MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 15 OF 2019
CHESERET ARAP KORIR………………………….….…..APPLICANT
VERSUS
EQUATORIAL LAND HOLDINGS LIMITED…………RESPONDENT
RULING
1. The Applicant moved the court through the Motion dated 19th July, 2019 seeking for maintaining of status quo ordered on 1st March, 2019 in Eldoret ELC No. 127 of 2018 and restraining of the Respondent from carrying on any activity on the suit land pending the hearing and determination of the Applicant’s Motion to set aside the arbitral award and the Respondent’s application to adopt the award. He also prays in the alternative for the court to call Eldoret ELC No. 127 of 2018 and stay delivery of the ruling pending the hearing and determination of the applications for setting aside and adoption of the award.The Applicant also prays for costs. The application is based on the ten (10) grounds on its face and supported by the undated affidavit sworn by the Applicant and filed with the Motion.
2. The application is opposed by the Respondent vide the replying affidavit sworn by David May, the Managing Director on the 26th July, 2019.
3. The learned Counsel for the Applicant filed the written submissions dated the 20th September, 2019. There are no submissions by the learned Counsel for the Respondent in the record.
4. The following are the issues for the court’s determinations;
(a) Whether the Applicant has made a reasonable case for granting the status quo and injunctive order sought or alternatively whether the Applicant has made a reasonable case for staying the ruling pending in Eldoret ELC No. 127 of 2019, pending the hearing and determination of the parties’ application dated 6th May, 2019 and 10th June, 2019.
(b) Who pays the costs?
5. The court has carefully considered the grounds on the application, the affidavit evidence, the written submissions, the record and come to the following conclusions;
(a) That the ruling sought to be stayed in the alternative prayer (3) in Eldoret ELC No. 127 of 2018 was reportedly delivered on the 23rd July, 2019 as per paragraph 9 of the Respondent’s replying affidavit, which deposition has not been challenged by the Applicant. That it follows that the status quo dictated through the court order of 1st March, 2019 in Eldoret ELC No. 127 of 2018 that Applicant sought to be maintained under prayer (2) was definitely altered vide the ruling delivered on the 23rd July, 2019.
(b) That further to the finding in (a) above, the Motions dated 6th May, 2019 and 10th June, 2019 that Applicant wanted to be heard and determined first have today been determined through an earlier ruling and therefore prayers (2) and (3) have been overtaken by events.
(c) That the Applicant having failed in both prayers is in accordance with Section 27 of the Civil Procedure Act Chapter 21 of Laws of Kenya obligated to pay the Respondent’s costs.
6. That in view of the foregoing, the Applicant’s Motion dated the 19th July, 2019 has no merit and is dismissed with costs.
Orders accordingly.
DatedandsignedatEldoretthis26thday ofFebruary, 2020.
S. M. KIBUNJA
JUDGE
Ruling read in open court in the presence of:
Mr. Kimani for Applicant.
Mr. Menezes & Maganga for Respondent.
Court Assistant: Christine