[2003] KEHC 666 (KLR)
The court found that the 2nd defendant was solely responsible for the accident due to negligent driving, as evidenced by the police abstract and the absence of any contrary evidence from the defendants, whose defence was struck out for non-compliance with discovery orders. The 1st defendant, as employer, was held...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2003] KEHC 666 (KLR)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Chetunda Moraa Nyamwamu; Defendant: Philip Kipkemboi Chelule; Defendant: Obuya Express & Another
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Kisii
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- ? 393 of 1998
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Suit / Judgment
- Outcome
- Judgment for the plaintiff against both defendants jointly and severally.
- Judges
- K Bauni
- Legal Topics
- Fatal Accidents, Negligence, Vicarious Liability, Damages Assessment
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Chetunda Moraa Nyamwamu
Plaintiff
Philip Kipkemboi Chelule
Defendant
Obuya Express & Another
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Suit / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the defendants were liable for the fatal accident resulting in the death of the deceased.
- 2 Whether the plaintiff proved negligence against the defendants.
- 3 What quantum of damages is payable to the plaintiff under the Fatal Accidents Act and Law Reform Act.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the 2nd defendant was solely responsible for the accident due to negligent driving, as evidenced by the police abstract and the absence of any contrary evidence from the defendants, whose defence was struck out for non-compliance with discovery orders. The 1st defendant, as employer, was held vicariously liable. The court assessed damages under three heads: pain and suffering (KShs. 10,000), loss of expectation of life (KShs. 80,000), and loss of dependency (KShs. 400,000), applying a multiplier of 10 years, a dependency ratio of 2/3, and a monthly income of KShs. 5,000. The total award was KShs. 490,000, with costs and interest to the plaintiff.
Court Disposition
Judgment for the plaintiff against both defendants jointly and severally.
Orders
- Plaintiff awarded KShs. 10,000 for pain and suffering.
- Plaintiff awarded KShs. 80,000 for loss of expectation of life.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
32 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT KISII
CIVIL SUIT NO.393 OF 1998
CHETUNDA MORAA NYAMWAMU ………………………………….. PLAINTIFF
VERSUS
PHILIP KIPKEMBOI CHELULE ……………………………….…. 1ST DEFENDANT
OBUYA EXPRESS & ANOTHER ………………………………… 2ND DEFENDANT
JUDGMENT:
CHETUNDA MORAA NYAMWAMU (plaintiff) brought this suit as the personal representative of the Estate of the late COSMAS NYAMWAMU NYAREKI who was her husband. She told court that on 17th January 1997 the deceased was traveling in an Obuya Express Bus which was being driven by PHILLIPH KIPKEMBOI, the 2nd defendant. The bus was involved in an accident and the deceased died. The 2nd defendant was charged with the offence of causing death by dangerous driving.
In their written defence the defendants blamed the accident on the negligence of the driver of motor vehicles Reg. No.KYW 622 and KYX 436. They however did not enjoin them as 3rd parties.
The defendants were ordered on 29/11/01 to make their discoveries within 30 days or the defence be struck out. They did not comply with the order and on 26/1/04 the defence was struck out. They therefore did not offer any evidence.
PW1 the plaintiff was not at the scene when the accident occurred. However she produced a police abstract – Exh.P3, which indicated that the 2nd defendant was charged with the offence of causing death by dangerous driving.
I am satisfied that the 2nd defendant was 100% to blame for the accident. He was negligent. He was a driver of the 1st defendant who is also vicariously liable.
As for damages the plaintiff did not prove any special damages. They were not even pleaded.
Court was not told how soon the deceased died after the accident. I would assume he died instantly. I will award shs.10,000/= for pain and suffering. As for loss of expectation of life the deceased was 42 years old when he died. I will award a sum of shs.80,000/= under that head.
As for loss of dependency the deceased was 42 years old when he died. Normally people retire at 55 years of age meaning he had 13 more years. However taking into account the exigencies of life I feel that a multiplier of 10 years is reasonable and I will apply the same.
Deceased’s salary was shown in the letter of offer as shs.5000/= per month. It is not clear if there were any statutory deductions but if there were, it would have been shown in the letter. I will therefore take the monthly salary as shs.5000/=.
Deceased had a wife and six children. A dependency of 2/3 is therefore proper.
Thus shs.5000/= x 10 x 12 x 2/3 = shs.400,000/=
I therefore enter judgment for the plaintiff against both defendants jointly and severally as follows:-
Pain and suffering ………………………………….. shs. 10,000/=
Loss of expectation for life ………………………… shs. 80,000/=
Loss of dependency ………………………………… shs.400,000/=
TOTAL shs.490,000/=
The plaintiff will also have the costs of the suit and interest.
KABURU BAUNI
JUDGE
Signed, dated and delivered this 3rd June 2003.
KABURU BAUNI
JUDGE
Mr. Kaburi for Nyaencha.
KABURU BAUNI
JUDGE