[2024] KECA 436 (KLR)

[2024] KECA 436 (KLR)

The court found that the parties had entered into a consent to compromise the application for extension of time to file and serve the record of appeal. The respondents confirmed their agreement to the consent, and there was no opposition to the application. In the exercise of its discretion and in recognition of the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2024] KECA 436 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Chief Officer, Lands, Housing & Physical Planning County Government of Mombasa; Applicant: County Government of Mombasa; Respondent: Abdullah Ahmed Gele t/a Buxton Filling Station; Respondent: Buxton Point Apartments Ltd; Respondent: Hon Suleiman Shabal; Respondent: Roton Construction Co Ltd; Respondent: The Chief Land Registrar
Court
Court of Appeal
Court Station
Court of Appeal at Mombasa
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Appeal (Application) E086 of 2023
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Application for Extension of Time to File and Serve Record of Appeal
Outcome
application allowed by consent
Judges
AK Murgor
Legal Topics
Extension of Time, Record of Appeal, Contempt of Court Orders, Consent Orders
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Land and Property Extension of Time Record of Appeal Contempt of Court Orders Consent Orders

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Chief Officer, Lands, Housing & Physical Planning County Government of Mombasa

Applicant

County Government of Mombasa

Applicant

Abdullah Ahmed Gele t/a Buxton Filling Station

Respondent

Buxton Point Apartments Ltd

Respondent

Hon Suleiman Shabal

Respondent

Roton Construction Co Ltd

Respondent

The Chief Land Registrar

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Application for Extension of Time to File and Serve Record of Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the applicants have demonstrated sufficient cause for extension of time to file and serve the record of appeal out of time.
  2. 2 Whether the delay in filing and serving the record of appeal was adequately explained.
  3. 3 Whether the consent of the parties to compromise the application should be adopted by the court.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the parties had entered into a consent to compromise the application for extension of time to file and serve the record of appeal. The respondents confirmed their agreement to the consent, and there was no opposition to the application. In the exercise of its discretion and in recognition of the parties' consent, the court allowed the application, deeming the record of appeal as properly filed and served. The court made no order as to costs, emphasizing the consensual resolution of the application and the absence of prejudice to any party.

Court Disposition

application allowed by consent

Orders

  • The application for extension of time to file and serve the record of appeal is allowed.
  • The record of appeal dated 13th September 2023 and filed on 15th September 2023 is deemed as properly filed and served on all parties.