[2023] KEELC 18454 (KLR)

[2023] KEELC 18454 (KLR)

The court found that the appellant's failure to deposit the required security was occasioned by issues with the judiciary's payment system, a circumstance beyond their control. The court further noted that the respondents did not oppose the application and that the interests of justice required that the appellant...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2023] KEELC 18454 (KLR)
Parties
Appellant: China Communication Construction Company; Respondent: Hussein Abdi; Respondent: Daud Tano
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Isiolo
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment and Land Appeal E008 of 2022
Procedural Posture
Environment and Land Appeal / Ruling on Application for Reinstatement and Stay of Execution
Outcome
application allowed; conditional stay of execution granted
Judges
PM Njoroge
Legal Topics
Stay of Execution, Reinstatement of Application, Security for Costs, Review of Court Orders
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Land and Property Stay of Execution Reinstatement of Application Security for Costs Review of Court Orders

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

China Communication Construction Company

Appellant

Hussein Abdi

Respondent

Daud Tano

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Environment and Land Appeal / Ruling on Application for Reinstatement and Stay of Execution

  1. 1 Whether the court should review, vary or set aside the order dismissing the appellant's application for stay of execution.
  2. 2 Whether the application for stay of execution should be reinstated and conditional stay granted pending hearing.
  3. 3 Whether failure to deposit security was due to circumstances beyond the appellant's control.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the appellant's failure to deposit the required security was occasioned by issues with the judiciary's payment system, a circumstance beyond their control. The court further noted that the respondents did not oppose the application and that the interests of justice required that the appellant not be shut out from being heard on merit. Consequently, the court allowed the application, set aside the dismissal order, reinstated the application, and granted a conditional stay of execution upon deposit of Kshs 900,000 as security within 14 days, failing which the stay would lapse automatically.

Court Disposition

application allowed; conditional stay of execution granted

Orders

  • The application dated June 13, 2023 is allowed.
  • The order dismissing the appellant's application dated May 4, 2023 is set aside.