[2023] KEELC 20218 (KLR)

[2023] KEELC 20218 (KLR)

The court held that, in the absence of any objection, the suit should be marked as withdrawn as requested by the plaintiffs. On the issue of costs, the court applied the general principle that costs follow the event, meaning the plaintiffs, having initiated and then withdrawn the suit, should bear the costs incurred...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2023] KEELC 20218 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Mary Wangari Chira; Plaintiff: Florence Wanjiku Muchai; Plaintiff: Regina Wangui Mwaura; Defendant: Teresa Wambui Gakuo; Defendant: Dennis Mwaura Gakuo; Defendant: The Land Registrar, Kiambu
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Thika
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Case 093 of 2021
Procedural Posture
Environment and Land Case / Ruling on Withdrawal and Costs
Outcome
Suit withdrawn; plaintiffs to bear costs.
Judges
BM Eboso
Legal Topics
Withdrawal of Suit, Costs Follow Event, Taxation of Costs, Land Disputes
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Land and Property Withdrawal of Suit Costs Follow Event Taxation of Costs Land Disputes

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mary Wangari Chira

Plaintiff

Florence Wanjiku Muchai

Plaintiff

Regina Wangui Mwaura

Plaintiff

Teresa Wambui Gakuo

Defendant

Dennis Mwaura Gakuo

Defendant

The Land Registrar, Kiambu

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Environment and Land Case / Ruling on Withdrawal and Costs

  1. 1 Whether the suit should be marked as withdrawn upon the plaintiffs' request.
  2. 2 Who should bear the costs of the withdrawn suit and how should the quantum be determined.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that, in the absence of any objection, the suit should be marked as withdrawn as requested by the plaintiffs. On the issue of costs, the court applied the general principle that costs follow the event, meaning the plaintiffs, having initiated and then withdrawn the suit, should bear the costs incurred by the defendants. The quantum of such costs is to be determined by the taxing officer, as is standard procedure in withdrawn suits. The court therefore ordered the suit withdrawn and directed that the plaintiffs bear the costs, with the amount to be assessed by the taxing officer.

Court Disposition

Suit withdrawn; plaintiffs to bear costs.

Orders

  • The suit is marked as withdrawn.
  • The plaintiffs shall bear the costs of the withdrawn suit, to be assessed by the taxing officer.