[2017] KEHC 2120 (KLR)

[2017] KEHC 2120 (KLR)

The court held that while it has discretion to order cross-examination of deponents at any stage if it serves justice, it is unnecessary at the interlocutory stage in this case. The issues raised for cross-examination go to the merits of the substantive petition and would be better addressed during the main hearing....

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2017] KEHC 2120 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Chorlim Multipurpose Co-operative Society Limited; Applicant: John Kisa Ngeywo; Applicant: Joseph Naibei Berra; Respondent: The Hon. Attorney General; Respondent: The National Land Commission; Respondent: The Ecosystem Conservator Trans-Nzoia County; Respondent: The Director of Kenya Forest Services; Respondent: The Land Principal Secretary, Ministry of Lands, Housing and Urban Development; Respondent: The Director of Surveys Ministry of Lands, Housing and Urban Development; Respondent: The Director of Land Adjudication and Settlement, Ministry of Land, Housing and Urban Development; Respondent: The Land Adjudication and Settlement Officer, Trans-Nzoia County; Respondent: The Chief Land Registrar; Respondent: The District Land Registration Trans-Nzoia County
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Kitale
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Constitutional Petition 4 of 2017
Procedural Posture
Constitutional Petition / Interlocutory Application (cross Examination of Deponent at Conservatory Order Stage)
Outcome
Application for cross-examination of the deponent at the interlocutory stage declined.
Judges
FM Njoroge
Legal Topics
Public Land Management, Conservatory Orders, Cross Examination of Deponents, Administrative Action, Land Adjudication, Fundamental Rights
Source Language
en
Constitutional Law Land and Property Public Land Management Conservatory Orders Cross Examination of Deponents Administrative Action Land Adjudication Fundamental Rights

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 8 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Chorlim Multipurpose Co-operative Society Limited

Applicant

John Kisa Ngeywo

Applicant

Joseph Naibei Berra

Applicant

The Hon. Attorney General

Respondent

The National Land Commission

Respondent

The Ecosystem Conservator Trans-Nzoia County

Respondent

The Director of Kenya Forest Services

Respondent

The Land Principal Secretary, Ministry of Lands, Housing and Urban Development

Respondent

The Director of Surveys Ministry of Lands, Housing and Urban Development

Respondent

The Director of Land Adjudication and Settlement, Ministry of Land, Housing and Urban Development

Respondent

The Land Adjudication and Settlement Officer, Trans-Nzoia County

Respondent

The Chief Land Registrar

Respondent

The District Land Registration Trans-Nzoia County

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Constitutional Petition / Interlocutory Application (cross Examination of Deponent at Conservatory Order Stage)

  1. 1 Whether cross-examination of the deponent of the 2nd respondent's replying affidavit should be ordered at the interlocutory stage.
  2. 2 Whether the application for cross-examination is necessary for the fair determination of the conservatory order application.
  3. 3 Whether piecemeal hearings would prejudice the expeditious disposal of the substantive petition.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that while it has discretion to order cross-examination of deponents at any stage if it serves justice, it is unnecessary at the interlocutory stage in this case. The issues raised for cross-examination go to the merits of the substantive petition and would be better addressed during the main hearing. Ordering cross-examination now would result in piecemeal hearings and delay the expeditious disposal of the petition. The court noted that the time for cross-examination may arise later, particularly when the substantive petition is being heard. Accordingly, the application for cross-examination at this stage was declined, and the parties were directed to prepare for the...

Court Disposition

Application for cross-examination of the deponent at the interlocutory stage declined.

Orders

  • Parties to prepare for the hearing of the application dated 11/7/2017.
  • No order for cross-examination of the deponent at this stage.