[2008] KEHC 577 (KLR)
The court held that the failure to indicate the language used during plea taking rendered the plea equivocal and vitiated the proceedings. Citing Adan vs Republic [1973] E.A. 445, the court emphasized that the charge and essential ingredients of the offence must be explained to the accused in a language he...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2008] KEHC 577 (KLR)
- Parties
- Appellant: Christine Nzula Mulwa; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Machakos
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Appeal 77 of 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal allowed; conviction quashed; sentence set aside; retrial ordered
- Judges
- I Lenaola
- Legal Topics
- Plea Taking, Language of Proceedings, Attempted Murder, Procedural Fairness
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Christine Nzula Mulwa
Appellant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the plea of guilty was unequivocal given the absence of indication of the language used during plea taking.
- 2 Whether failure to indicate the language used in plea taking vitiates the proceedings.
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that the failure to indicate the language used during plea taking rendered the plea equivocal and vitiated the proceedings. Citing Adan vs Republic [1973] E.A. 445, the court emphasized that the charge and essential ingredients of the offence must be explained to the accused in a language he understands. Since this was not done, the conviction and sentence could not stand. The court allowed the appeal, quashed the conviction, set aside the sentence, and ordered a retrial before a different magistrate.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed; conviction quashed; sentence set aside; retrial ordered
Orders
- The appeal is allowed.
- The conviction is quashed and sentence is set aside.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
16 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MACHAKOS Criminal Appeal 77 of 2005
CHRISTINE NZULA MULWA...............................APPLICANT
VERSUS
REPUBLIC......................................................RESPONDENT
JUDGMENT
1. The Appellant, Christine Nzula Mulwa was the accused person in Machakos CM’s Court Criminal Case No. 2111/2005. She faced the charge of attempted murder contrary to section 220(a) of the Penal Code. The particulars were that on the 26th day of July 2005 at St Valentine Estate in Machakos District within Eastern Province unlawfully attempted to cause the death of Rosalia Kanini Mutuku by poisoning toasts of bread with RED CAT POISON.”
2. On 28. 7.2005 when she was asked to plead to the charges, the Appellant pleaded guilty and was sentenced to serve 10 years in prison. She preferred the present appeal which is conceded principally for the reason that the plea was not unequivocal and the language used was not indicated at all in the proceedings. A retrial is sought which is not opposed.
3. I agree that where the language used in taking the plea is not indicated as is the case here, then it is the law as I understand it, that the proceedings are vitiated. It was said in Adan vs Republic [1973] E.A. 445 that where the charge and essential ingredients of the offence are not explained to the accused in his language or in a language he understands, the plea was equivocal and the appeal was allowed.
4. That being the law, the Appeal is allowed and the conviction is quashed and sentence is set aside. There being no objection to a retrial and since no reason has been advanced why I should not make such an order, the Appellant shall be retried before the CM’s Court in Machakos by any magistrate other than T.O. Okello Esq. S.R.M.
5. Orders accordingly.
Dated and delivered at Machakos this 4thday of December 2008.
Isaac Lenaola
Judge
In the presence of: Mr. Makundi for Appellant
Isaac Lenaola
Judge