[2014] KEELC 159 (KLR)

[2014] KEELC 159 (KLR)

The court found that the plaintiff had obtained judgment nearly a year prior, declaring him the rightful owner of the suit land and ordering the defendant to vacate. The only reason for the delay in execution was the absence of the Deputy Registrar, which prevented taxation of costs. The defendant neither opposed...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2014] KEELC 159 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Christopher Kendagor; Defendant: Christopher Kipkorir
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Eldoret
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Judgment Date
7 October 2014
Case Number
Environment & Land Case 919 of 2012
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application to Execute Decree Before Taxation of Costs
Outcome
application allowed
Legal Topics
Execution of Decree, Taxation of Costs, Ownership of Land
Source Language
english
Land and Property Civil Procedure Execution of Decree Taxation of Costs Ownership of Land

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Christopher Kendagor

Plaintiff

Christopher Kipkorir

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application to Execute Decree Before Taxation of Costs

  1. 1 Whether the plaintiff should be permitted to execute the decree before taxation of costs.
  2. 2 Whether delay in taxation of costs justifies granting leave to execute the decree.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the plaintiff had obtained judgment nearly a year prior, declaring him the rightful owner of the suit land and ordering the defendant to vacate. The only reason for the delay in execution was the absence of the Deputy Registrar, which prevented taxation of costs. The defendant neither opposed the application nor appeared in court. The court held that there was no justifiable reason to deny the plaintiff the right to execute the decree before taxation of costs, as further delay would unjustly deprive him of possession of his land. Accordingly, the application was allowed, and the plaintiff was permitted to execute the decree prior to taxation of costs.

Court Disposition

application allowed

Orders

  • The plaintiff is permitted to execute the decree before taxation of costs.
  • No order as to costs of this application.