[2012] KEHC 2902 (KLR)
The court found that the Plaintiffs had produced a valid title deed showing registration as proprietors of LR No. 209/9451. The Defendants, having failed to attend the hearing or present any evidence, did not controvert the Plaintiffs' evidence. On a balance of probabilities, the Plaintiffs proved their ownership...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2012] KEHC 2902 (KLR)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Christopher M. Mukirai; Plaintiff: Jane Chepkoech; Plaintiff: Pauline Kirombo; Plaintiff: Evans Mwamunga Mazoi; Plaintiff: Grace Mwahaki; Defendant: Michael Omondi; Defendant: Peter Mwangi; Defendant: Sara Wairimu; Defendant: Boniface Githinji; Defendant: Pasta Judah; Defendant: Amakaru Aboye
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Environment & Land Case 484 of 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Environment and Land Case / Judgment
- Outcome
- judgment for the plaintiffs
- Judges
- P Nyamweya
- Legal Topics
- Ownership Disputes, Eviction, Title Registration
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Christopher M. Mukirai
Plaintiff
Jane Chepkoech
Plaintiff
Pauline Kirombo
Plaintiff
Evans Mwamunga Mazoi
Plaintiff
Grace Mwahaki
Plaintiff
Michael Omondi
Defendant
Peter Mwangi
Defendant
Sara Wairimu
Defendant
Boniface Githinji
Defendant
Pasta Judah
Defendant
Amakaru Aboye
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Environment and Land Case / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Plaintiffs are the lawful registered owners of Land Reference Number 209/9451.
- 2 Whether the Defendants unlawfully occupied the Plaintiffs' land and should be evicted.
- 3 Whether the Plaintiffs are entitled to costs and other reliefs sought.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the Plaintiffs had produced a valid title deed showing registration as proprietors of LR No. 209/9451. The Defendants, having failed to attend the hearing or present any evidence, did not controvert the Plaintiffs' evidence. On a balance of probabilities, the Plaintiffs proved their ownership and entitlement to possession. The continued occupation by the Defendants was unlawful, and the Plaintiffs were entitled to eviction orders and costs. The court therefore declared the Plaintiffs as owners and ordered the Defendants to vacate within 60 days, failing which execution would issue.
Court Disposition
judgment for the plaintiffs
Orders
- The Plaintiffs are declared the owners and entitled to possession of Land Reference Number 209/9451.
- The Defendants are ordered to vacate Land Reference Number 209/9451 within 60 days of service of the orders, failing which execution shall proceed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
32 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI(MILIMANI COMMERCIAL COURTS)
Environmental & Land Case 484 of 2009
CHRISTOPHER M. MUKIRAI ………….….......................................................…………..…1ST PLAINTIFF
JANE CHEPKOECH ………………………….................................................…………….2ND PLAINTIFF
PAULINE KIROMBO………………………...................................................……………...3RD PLAINTIFF
EVANS MWAMUNGA MAZOI………………….....................................................………..4TH PLAINTIFF
GRACE MWAHAKI……………………………....................................................………….5TH PLAINTIFF
VERSUS
MICHAEL OMONDI..……........……………..................................................…………..1ST DEFENDANT
PETER MWANGI……………………………...............................................…………..2ND DEFENDANT
SARA WAIRIMU………………………................................................………………..3RD DEFENDANT
BONIFACE GITHINJI…………………………...................................................………..4TH DEFENDANT
PASTA JUDAH……………………………….................................................………….5TH DEFENDANT
AMAKARU ABOYE……………………..................................................……………….6TH DEFENDANT
JUDGMENT OF THE COURT
The Plaintiffs filed suit by way of a Plaint dated 28th September 2009 and filed on the same date, wherein they are seeking the following orders:
1. A declaration that Land L. R. No. 209/9451 and Plan Number 234882 legally and lawfully belongs to the Plaintiffs.
2. An order to be issued against the Defendants, their agents, servants or anyone else purporting to occupy the said land on authority from the Defendants that they vacate forthwith from the said property.
3. Costs of this suit together with interest thereon.
4. Any other or such further relief that this Honourable court may deem fit to grant in favour of the plaintiffs against the defendants.
The Plaintiffs’ claim is that at all material times they were the registered owners of Land Reference Number 209/9451, having acquiring a title in respect of the land on 10th August 2001. Further, that in 2007 the Defendants invaded the Plaintiffs’ land, erected illegal structures thereon, and are now committing waste and destruction on the said property. The Plaintiffs allege that despite several demand letters and notices to vacate, the Defendants have refused/ignored to vacate from the land.
The Defendants entered appearance on 28th January 2010 and have a Defence dated the same date and filed on 9th March 2010. The Defendants denied the Plaintiffs’ averments and stated in the said Defence that they would prove their right of ownership at the hearing of the suit. Having satisfied myself that the hearing notice was duly served on the Defendants, I proceeded to hear the Plaintiffs case in the absence of the Defendants on 21st May 2012. An affidavit of service sworn on 27th March 2012 by Samson Ndegwa Thuku, a process server of this Court, and filed on 17th May, 2012 attests to the service of the said hearing notice.
The Plaintiffs’ only witness (PW1) was Christopher Mabea Mukirai, the 1st Plaintiff. PW1 testified that the other Plaintiffs are his partners with respect to a plot known as LR No. 209/9451 situated along Kangundo road in Nairobi which they purchased and registered in their names. PW1 testified that they were first were issued with an allotment letter and then with a title deed with respect to the said plot in on 28th December 2001. He produced the original title deed in court and a copy of the same as exhibit 1.
PW1 further testified that when the Plaintiffs acquired the said plot it was vacant, and some squatters then invaded the land in 2007. The Plaintiffs thereupon reported the matter to the Provincial Administration who issued notices to vacate. However, after being served with the said notices to vacate a few of the squatters remained on the plot namely the Defendants who have put up mabati (iron sheet) structures and semi-permanent structures on the said plot. The Plaintiffs stated that they wanted the Court to grant them eviction orders, and after the close of their case, their Advocate asked for a judgment date, stating that he did not wish to make any submissions.
I have carefully read and consideredthe Plaintiffs’ pleadings and evidence, andhave perused the title deed produced in evidence by the Plaintiffs. I note that the said title deed was issued to the Plaintiffs on 10th August 2001 with respect to the land parcel known as LR No. 209/9451, and registered on 28th December 2001. I therefore find that the Plaintiffs have been able to prove on a balance of probabilities that they are the registered owners of the said land. In addition since the Defendants have not controverted the Plaintiffs’ evidence, this Court enters judgment for the Plaintiffs as follows:
1. That the Plaintiffs herein namely Christopher M. Mukirai,Jane Chepkoech, Pauline Kirombo, Evans Mwamunga Mazoi and Grace Mwahaki, are hereby declared the owners and entitled to possession of theparcel of land known as Land Reference Number 209/9451.
2. That the Defendants herein namely Michael Omondi, Peter Mwangi, Sara Wairimu, Boniface Githinji, Pasta Judah, and Amakaru Aboye, arehereby ordered to vacate the parcel of registered as Land Reference Number 209/9451 within 60 days of date of service by the Plaintiffs of these orders, failing which the execution of decree against them shall proceed.
3. The Plaintiffs are awarded the costs of this suit.
Dated, signed and delivered in open court at Nairobi this ____23rd_____ day of____July_____, 2012.
P. NYAMWEYA
JUDGE