[2018] KEHC 1170 (KLR)
The court held that the mediation settlement agreement filed and signed by both parties, and certified by the mediator, was binding and enforceable as a judgment of the court. The defendant was therefore obligated to remove the radio repeater from the plaintiff's premises and pay the agreed sums of Kshs.600,000 in...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2018] KEHC 1170 (KLR)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Christopher S. Muinde; Defendant: Airtel Kenya Limited
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Mombasa
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Civil Case 657 of 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Case / Judgment After Mediation Settlement
- Outcome
- Judgment entered for the plaintiff against the defendant on the terms of the mediation settlement agreement.
- Judges
- CA Otieno
- Legal Topics
- Removal of Radio Repeater, Settlement Agreement Enforcement, Payment of Damages, Costs Award
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Christopher S. Muinde
Plaintiff
Airtel Kenya Limited
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Case / Judgment After Mediation Settlement
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the mediation settlement agreement filed by the parties should be adopted as the judgment of the court.
- 2 Whether the defendant is obligated to remove the radio repeater from the plaintiff's premises.
- 3 Whether the defendant is liable to pay the agreed sums to the plaintiff as per the settlement.
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that the mediation settlement agreement filed and signed by both parties, and certified by the mediator, was binding and enforceable as a judgment of the court. The defendant was therefore obligated to remove the radio repeater from the plaintiff's premises and pay the agreed sums of Kshs.600,000 in settlement of the claim and Kshs.150,000 as costs, totaling Kshs.750,000, within the stipulated period. In default, execution would issue. The court's decision was grounded on the principle that parties are bound by their own settlement agreements once adopted by the court.
Court Disposition
Judgment entered for the plaintiff against the defendant on the terms of the mediation settlement agreement.
Orders
- The defendant shall remove the radio repeater from the suit premises within 30 days of the judgment date.
- The defendant shall pay to the plaintiff Kshs.600,000 in settlement of the claim.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
18 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA
AT MOMBASA
CIVIL CASE NO. 657 OF 2011
CHRISTOPHER S. MUINDE.............................................................PLAINTIFF
VERSUS
AIRTEL KENYA LIMITED.............................................................DEFENDANT
J U D G M E N T
1. There is a mediation settlement agreement filed in court on the 28/11/2018 duly signed by parties and certified by the mediator.
2. Based on that settlement judgment is entered for the plaintiff against the defendant as follows:-
i. The defendant shall remove the radio repeater the subject matter of the suit from the suit premises within 30 days of todays date.
ii. The defendant shall pay to the plaintiff the sum of Kshs.600,000/= in settlement of the claim.
iii. The defendant shall pay to the plaintiff costs agreed at Kshs.150,000/=.
iv. The sums in (ii) & (iii) above being Kshs.750,000/= shall be paid to the plaintiff within 45 days from today.
v. In default execution to issue.
Dated and delivered at Mombasa this 20th day of December 2018.
P.J.O. OTIENO
JUDGE