[2017] KEELC 671 (KLR)
The court found that the plaintiff had produced the original title deed to the suit land registered in his name, and his evidence regarding ownership and the circumstances of acquisition was uncontroverted. The defendants, having failed to attend the hearing or cross-examine the plaintiff, did not discharge their...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2017] KEELC 671 (KLR)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Christopher Wanyama Wekesa; Defendant: Anthony Wesakulila & 19 Others
- Court
- Environment and Land Court
- Court Station
- Environment and Land Court at Kitale
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Land Case 90 of 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Land Case / Judgment
- Outcome
- Plaintiff's claim allowed. Eviction order granted against all defendants. Costs awarded to plaintiff.
- Judges
- FM Njoroge
- Legal Topics
- Eviction, Land Ownership, Title Registration, Adverse Possession, Fraud in Land Transactions
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Christopher Wanyama Wekesa
Plaintiff
Anthony Wesakulila & 19 Others
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Land Case / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the plaintiff is the registered proprietor of the suit land and entitled to possession.
- 2 Whether the defendants trespassed onto the plaintiff's land and erected structures without consent.
- 3 Whether the plaintiff obtained title to the suit land by fraud as alleged by some defendants.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the plaintiff had produced the original title deed to the suit land registered in his name, and his evidence regarding ownership and the circumstances of acquisition was uncontroverted. The defendants, having failed to attend the hearing or cross-examine the plaintiff, did not discharge their burden of proving fraud. The court held that the plaintiff had proved his case on a balance of probabilities and was entitled to an order of eviction against the defendants, as well as costs of the suit.
Court Disposition
Plaintiff's claim allowed. Eviction order granted against all defendants. Costs awarded to plaintiff.
Orders
- An order of eviction is issued against all the defendants from land known as Kiminini/Kinyoro Block 3/Matisi/687.
- The costs of the suit shall be borne by the defendants jointly and severally.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
26 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE ENVIRONMENT AND LAND COURT AT KITALE
LAND CASE NO. 90 OF 2009
CHRISTOPHER WANYAMA WEKESA.......................PLAINTIFF
VERSUS
ANTHONY WESAKULILA& 19 OTHERS............DEFENDANTS
JUDGMENT
1. The plaintiff filed this suit on 7/7/2009. He claimed to be the registered proprietor of Title No. Kiminini/Kinyoro Block 3/Matisi/687 measuring 0. 828 Ha.or thereabouts, on which the defendants trespassed sometime between 2000 - 2003 and erected structures. He avers that the defendants have refused to vacate the land despite demand. The plaintiff therefore prays for an order of eviction of the defendants from the suit land and costs of the suit.
2. The 7th, 10th, 12th, 15th, 18th and 19th defendants filed defence on 13/8/2009, claiming that if the plaintiff was the registered owner of the suit land, he obtained the title thereto by way of fraud. They set out the particulars of alleged fraud at paragraph 3 of their defence. Fraud and the particulars of fraud are denied by the plaintiff in the reply to defence.
3. The suit proceeded to hearing on 4/12/2014. Only PW1 the plaintiff testified. The counsel for the 7th, 10th, 12th, 15th, 18th and 19th defendants was absent. The other defendants never appeared then. The plaintiff closed his case. The first judgment in this case was delivered on 26/1/2015. That judgment was subsequently set aside by consent of the parties on 16/9/2015. The case was set down for hearing on 28/3/2016 on which date it never proceeded. The same thing happened on 12/9/2016, on 31/1/2017, on 2/3/2017 and on 18/4/2017. The suit finally proceeded to a fresh hearing on 2/10/2017. PW1 who is the plaintiff and PW2 testified.
4. The plaintiff produced the original title to the suit land. It is registered in his name. He stated that the defendants have been on the land from year 2000 and have built houses and in addition they farm on the land. The plaintiff averred that the land was transferred to him by his father when he was alive and that there was therefore no need for succession proceedings. The plaintiff avers that his father had shared out his land amongst his wives whereupon his mother got 2 acres when she was still alive. The plaintiff and PW2 who is his elder brother testified that the defendants had sold their entitlements which they had gotten following the sharing out of their father’s assets to his wives.
5. The defendants were not present to cross-examine the plaintiff and his witness. His evidence is therefore not controverted.
I find that the plaintiff has proved his case against the defendants on a balance of probabilities. I therefore issue an order of eviction against all the defendants from all that land known as Kiminini/Kinyoro Block 3/Matisi/687. The costs of the suit shall be borne by the defendants jointly and severally.
Dated, signed and delivered at Kitale on this 20thday of December, 2017.
MWANGI NJOROGE
JUDGE
20/12/2017
Before - Mwangi Njoroge -Judge
Court Assistant - Isabellah
Ms. Arunga for the plaintiff
N/A for the defendant
COURT
Judgment read in open court.
MWANGI NJOROGE
JUDGE
20/12/2017