[2015] KEELRC 1495 (KLR)

[2015] KEELRC 1495 (KLR)

The court held that the remedies sought by the claimant regarding computation of notice period and payment for leave and redundancy notice could only be determined after a substantive claim had been filed and heard on its merits. Since no such claim was before the court, the application was premature and constituted...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2015] KEELRC 1495 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Churchill Ongalo; Respondent: Kenya Kazi Security Services Limited
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Cause 741 of 2014
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Interlocutory Application
Outcome
application dismissed
Legal Topics
Redundancy Notice, Leave Entitlements, Court Process Abuse
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Redundancy Notice Leave Entitlements Court Process Abuse

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Churchill Ongalo

Applicant

Kenya Kazi Security Services Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Interlocutory Application

  1. 1 Whether the court should issue directions for computation of the notice period in respect of the redundancy letter and related correspondence.
  2. 2 Whether the court should direct the respondent to pay the claimant for accrued leave and unserved redundancy notice.
  3. 3 Whether the application is properly before the court or constitutes an abuse of process.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that the remedies sought by the claimant regarding computation of notice period and payment for leave and redundancy notice could only be determined after a substantive claim had been filed and heard on its merits. Since no such claim was before the court, the application was premature and constituted an abuse of the court process. The court therefore dismissed the application, directing the claimant to file a substantive claim if he wished to have the issues ventilated and determined.

Court Disposition

application dismissed

Orders

  • The claimant's application is dismissed with costs in the cause.