[2021] KEELRC 2380 (KLR)

[2021] KEELRC 2380 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant had not produced evidence of a strike notice as required by law and that there was no recognition agreement between the union and the respondent. The respondent had shown willingness to recognize the union and indicated that most employees who participated in the strike had...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2021] KEELRC 2380 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Kenya Union of Commercial, Food and Allied Workers; Respondent: Krimir Craft Limited
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Eldoret
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Cause E013 of 2021
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Interlocutory Application
Outcome
Application dismissed; parties directed to conciliation.
Legal Topics
Unlawful Suspension, Trade Union Recognition, Employee Strike, Withheld Salaries
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Unlawful Suspension Trade Union Recognition Employee Strike Withheld Salaries

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Kenya Union of Commercial, Food and Allied Workers

Applicant

Krimir Craft Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Interlocutory Application

  1. 1 Whether the suspension of the employees was unlawful and unfair.
  2. 2 Whether the respondent withheld salaries without justification.
  3. 3 Whether the respondent frustrated the employees' right to join a trade union.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant had not produced evidence of a strike notice as required by law and that there was no recognition agreement between the union and the respondent. The respondent had shown willingness to recognize the union and indicated that most employees who participated in the strike had apologized but refused to sign new contracts. The court held that the dispute was capable of amicable settlement and that granting the orders sought at the interlocutory stage would effectively determine the main suit. Therefore, the court declined to grant the orders for lifting suspension and payment of withheld salaries at this stage and instead directed the parties to submit the...

Court Disposition

Application dismissed; parties directed to conciliation.

Orders

  • The dispute is to be submitted for conciliation by the County Labour Office on the issue of recognition of the Claimant Union and reinstatement terms for the grievants or, if not possible, exit arrangement in accordance with the Employment Act.
  • The matter will be mentioned in 60 days from the date of the ruling for further directions or recording of settlement.